New subject: APNIC - The policy to end all policies prop-103-v001

10 Jul 2012


      That may be true for v4 (although I'm far from convinced).  But I'm not at
all buying it for v6

On Wednesday, July 11, 2012, wrote:
...
Actually, I think that this proposal is more than just to incite thinking,
it actually
has merit.  The v4 space is functionally all assigned.  Many/Most of the
existing policies
are focused on events that are no longer relevent.  new policies, if any,
should ensure
accurate recording of stewardship.   It would make an ISP's life -MUCH-
simpler.
/bill
...
So let me ask a simple question.
Do people think that there is a need to develop any more IP policies?  Or
are all the policies we have the moment sufficient for the future?
Dean
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
...
I think Randy's taking the wrong tactic with this.
Policy needs to be a series of no-rules cage fights or, maybe,
something
along the line of gladiator traditions in Roman time.
Then it could be televised, a profit made and APNIC run from that
...
...
rather than charging for IP addresses and ASes.
MMC
On 09/07/2012, at 6:08 AM, Dean Pemberton wrote:
...
Morning all,
Randy Bush (from IIJ in Japan) has just tabled a policy for
discussion
at the August APNIC members meeting.
Essentially if passed this would see the APNIC policy development
process disolved.
I'm interested in feedback that people on this list may have, and I'm
happy to pass it along on the sig-policy list or in person at the
meeting.
As always, feel free to contribute to what I'm sure will be heated
discussion on the APNIC sig-policy list.  I'll try and summarise the
happenings back here.
Regards,
Dean
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andy Linton 
Date: Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:32 AM
Subject: [sig-policy] prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy
Proposal
To: SIG policy 
Dear SIG members
The proposal "prop-103-v001:  A Final IP Address Policy Proposal" has
been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
It will be discussed at the Policy SIG at APNIC 34 in Phnom Penh,
Cambodia, Thursday, 30 August 2012.
We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:53:19PM +1200, Dean Pemberton wrote:
profit
list
...
...
...
before the meeting.
The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an
important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to
express your views on the proposal:
- Do you support or oppose this proposal?
         - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing?
If
           so, tell the community about your situation.
         - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
         - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
         - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it
more
           effective?
Information about this and other policy proposals is available from:
https://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-103
Andy, Skeeve, Masato
-------------------------------------------------------------------
prop-103-v001: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Author: Randy Bush
        
1. Introduction
-------------------
IPv4 is history, with no need to add more pol> > >
NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz javascript:; javascript:;
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
...
_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz javascript:;
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

Re: [nznog] APNIC - The policy to end all policies prop-103-v001

Dean Pemberton

Matthew Moyle-Croft

Nathan Ward

tags

participants (3)