Today I've noticed complaints from users within .ac.nz that requests to "google" result in various survey or commercial search farm websites. This seems to be down to the usual helpful browser/DNS completion trying * google * google.SITE.ac.nz * google.ac.nz and finding 74.55.102.12 returning 53KB of assorted javascript. We're going to redirect google.SITE.ac.nz to CNAME google.co.nz for now. The wider question -- should google.ac.nz even exist? -jim cheja23p(a)maru:~$ whois google.ac.nz % New Zealand Domain Name Registry Limited % Users confirm on submission their agreement to all published Terms % version: 5.00 query_datetime: 2011-07-21T16:15:59+12:00 domain_name: google.ac.nz query_status: 200 Active domain_dateregistered: 2011-03-20T20:44:05+13:00 domain_datebilleduntil: 2012-03-20T20:44:05+13:00 domain_datelastmodified: 2011-07-04T15:22:04+12:00 domain_delegaterequested: yes domain_signed: no % registrar_name: Aust Domains registrar_address1: PO BOX 3333 registrar_address2: Adelaide Tce registrar_city: Perth registrar_province: WA registrar_postalcode: 6932 registrar_country: AU (AUSTRALIA) registrar_phone: +61 8 9422 0888 registrar_fax: +61 8 9422 0889 registrar_email: help(a)austdomains.com.au % registrant_contact_name: Scott Mcvey registrant_contact_address1: 23 Cicada Cl registrant_contact_city: Buderim registrant_contact_province: QLD registrant_contact_postalcode: 4556 registrant_contact_country: AU (AUSTRALIA) registrant_contact_phone: +61 75 4765069 registrant_contact_fax: +61 75 4765069 registrant_contact_email: scottmcvey2003(a)yahoo.com.au % admin_contact_name: Scott Mcvey admin_contact_address1: 23 Cicada Cl admin_contact_city: Buderim admin_contact_province: QLD admin_contact_postalcode: 4556 admin_contact_country: AU (AUSTRALIA) admin_contact_phone: +61 75 4765069 admin_contact_fax: +61 75 4765069 admin_contact_email: scottmcvey2003(a)yahoo.com.au % technical_contact_name: Scott Mcvey technical_contact_address1: 23 Cicada Cl technical_contact_city: Buderim technical_contact_province: QLD technical_contact_postalcode: 4556 technical_contact_country: AU (AUSTRALIA) technical_contact_phone: +61 75 4765069 technical_contact_fax: +61 75 4765069 technical_contact_email: scottmcvey2003(a)yahoo.com.au % ns_name_01: ns1.rookdns.com ns_name_02: ns2.rookdns.com
On 21/07/2011, at 4:16 PM, Jim Cheetham wrote:
The wider question -- should google.ac.nz even exist?
Yes. As should sex-with-google.ac.nz and every variation you can think of. Its an open name space, first come first served, no morals required. regards Peter Mott Swizzle | Cloud Servers Tel. +64 21 279 4995 -/-
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Jim Cheetham wrote:
Today I've noticed complaints from users within .ac.nz that requests to "google" result in various survey or commercial search farm websites.
This seems to be down to the usual helpful browser/DNS completion trying * google * google.SITE.ac.nz * google.ac.nz
and finding 74.55.102.12 returning 53KB of assorted javascript.
We're going to redirect google.SITE.ac.nz to CNAME google.co.nz for now.
The wider question -- should google.ac.nz even exist?
http://publicsuffix.org/ appears to be the central site for rules for this sort of lookup behavour ( it actually covers cookies but I think the overlap is there). .nz doesn't look correct however. See also wpad.co.nz -- Simon Lyall | Very Busy | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/ "To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT.
Hi Simon On 21/07/2011, at 5:41 AM, Simon Lyall wrote:
http://publicsuffix.org/ appears to be the central site for rules for this sort of lookup behavour ( it actually covers cookies but I think the overlap is there).
.nz doesn't look correct however.
It is correct. The list is in a very unusual format. Our entry is *.nz The interpretation is 1. Registrations (delegated domains) are at the third level - i.e. something.something.nz (that's what the asterisk does, so as a counter example, .nl is just nl without the asterisk) 2. There are no exceptions given so there is never a case where something.nz should be treated as a registration (delegated domain). As an example, if .nz allowed say nic.nz with an A record for it then it would need the exception !nic.nz added. regards Jay
See also wpad.co.nz
That's registered by Beau, a 'safe pair of hands' who has presented on the dangers of leaving this unregistered at various events. We've offered to take it over from Beau if he ever needs us to. cheers Jay
-- Simon Lyall | Very Busy | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/ "To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT.
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
-- Jay Daley Chief Executive .nz Registry Services (New Zealand Domain Name Registry Limited) desk: +64 4 931 6977 mobile: +64 21 678840
The wider question -- should google.ac.nz even exist? Well, it obviously does. And there's no policy that prohibits it; if
On 21/07/11 16:16, Jim Cheetham wrote: there was, it would have to cover Facebook, TradeMe, Ebay,Yahoo, Bing, and every other "popular" site, with all the policy ugliness that would entail (what's a "popular site"?). The simple fact is that typing "google" and having it work due to browser searches is a convenience; it's never been guaranteed to work. If Google wanted that to work, they needed to buy up domain names for all the possible cases ... It's not a universal feature either. Firefox, on Linux doesn't appear to search any domain other than the domains listed in the resolver search path, i.e. it would look up google.site.ac.nz (assuming the domain is site.ac.nz), but not google.ac.nz. What you describe is a bit like the behaviour described (and proscribed) in RFC 1535, although I suspect that it doesn't do it if there's a '.' in the name, which deals with the specific case described in that RFC. If it does, then it's vulnerable to that issue. Your CNAME solution seems to be a reasonable approach if this is causing you problems. Google's web servers happily perform a redirect to www.google.co.nz or www.google.com as appropriate if they get traffic requesting a domain they don't recognise. Of course it may not work so well for other domains, depending on how those domains' web servers are set up. -- don
My goodness. I'll forward that on to my relevant contacts. Only been at Vic a week and already squatters. ;) On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Jim Cheetham wrote:
Today I've noticed complaints from users within .ac.nz that requests to "google" result in various survey or commercial search farm websites.
This seems to be down to the usual helpful browser/DNS completion trying * google * google.SITE.ac.nz * google.ac.nz
and finding 74.55.102.12 returning 53KB of assorted javascript.
We're going to redirect google.SITE.ac.nz to CNAME google.co.nz for now.
The wider question -- should google.ac.nz even exist?
-jim
cheja23p(a)maru:~$ whois google.ac.nz % New Zealand Domain Name Registry Limited % Users confirm on submission their agreement to all published Terms % version: 5.00 query_datetime: 2011-07-21T16:15:59+12:00 domain_name: google.ac.nz query_status: 200 Active domain_dateregistered: 2011-03-20T20:44:05+13:00 domain_datebilleduntil: 2012-03-20T20:44:05+13:00 domain_datelastmodified: 2011-07-04T15:22:04+12:00 domain_delegaterequested: yes domain_signed: no % registrar_name: Aust Domains registrar_address1: PO BOX 3333 registrar_address2: Adelaide Tce registrar_city: Perth registrar_province: WA registrar_postalcode: 6932 registrar_country: AU (AUSTRALIA) registrar_phone: +61 8 9422 0888 registrar_fax: +61 8 9422 0889 registrar_email: help(a)austdomains.com.au % registrant_contact_name: Scott Mcvey registrant_contact_address1: 23 Cicada Cl registrant_contact_city: Buderim registrant_contact_province: QLD registrant_contact_postalcode: 4556 registrant_contact_country: AU (AUSTRALIA) registrant_contact_phone: +61 75 4765069 registrant_contact_fax: +61 75 4765069 registrant_contact_email: scottmcvey2003(a)yahoo.com.au % admin_contact_name: Scott Mcvey admin_contact_address1: 23 Cicada Cl admin_contact_city: Buderim admin_contact_province: QLD admin_contact_postalcode: 4556 admin_contact_country: AU (AUSTRALIA) admin_contact_phone: +61 75 4765069 admin_contact_fax: +61 75 4765069 admin_contact_email: scottmcvey2003(a)yahoo.com.au % technical_contact_name: Scott Mcvey technical_contact_address1: 23 Cicada Cl technical_contact_city: Buderim technical_contact_province: QLD technical_contact_postalcode: 4556 technical_contact_country: AU (AUSTRALIA) technical_contact_phone: +61 75 4765069 technical_contact_fax: +61 75 4765069 technical_contact_email: scottmcvey2003(a)yahoo.com.au % ns_name_01: ns1.rookdns.com ns_name_02: ns2.rookdns.com _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
-- Josh Bailey
Which therefore begs the question: Should the .ac.nz and .school.nz
2LDs be moderated?
Quoting "Josh Bailey"
My goodness. I'll forward that on to my relevant contacts.
Only been at Vic a week and already squatters. ;)
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Jim Cheetham wrote:
Today I've noticed complaints from users within .ac.nz that requests to "google" result in various survey or commercial search farm websites.
This seems to be down to the usual helpful browser/DNS completion trying * google * google.SITE.ac.nz * google.ac.nz
and finding 74.55.102.12 returning 53KB of assorted javascript.
We're going to redirect google.SITE.ac.nz to CNAME google.co.nz for now.
The wider question -- should google.ac.nz even exist?
-jim
cheja23p(a)maru:~$ whois google.ac.nz % New Zealand Domain Name Registry Limited % Users confirm on submission their agreement to all published Terms % version: 5.00 query_datetime: 2011-07-21T16:15:59+12:00 domain_name: google.ac.nz query_status: 200 Active domain_dateregistered: 2011-03-20T20:44:05+13:00 domain_datebilleduntil: 2012-03-20T20:44:05+13:00 domain_datelastmodified: 2011-07-04T15:22:04+12:00 domain_delegaterequested: yes domain_signed: no % registrar_name: Aust Domains registrar_address1: PO BOX 3333 registrar_address2: Adelaide Tce registrar_city: Perth registrar_province: WA registrar_postalcode: 6932 registrar_country: AU (AUSTRALIA) registrar_phone: +61 8 9422 0888 registrar_fax: +61 8 9422 0889 registrar_email: help(a)austdomains.com.au % registrant_contact_name: Scott Mcvey registrant_contact_address1: 23 Cicada Cl registrant_contact_city: Buderim registrant_contact_province: QLD registrant_contact_postalcode: 4556 registrant_contact_country: AU (AUSTRALIA) registrant_contact_phone: +61 75 4765069 registrant_contact_fax: +61 75 4765069 registrant_contact_email: scottmcvey2003(a)yahoo.com.au % admin_contact_name: Scott Mcvey admin_contact_address1: 23 Cicada Cl admin_contact_city: Buderim admin_contact_province: QLD admin_contact_postalcode: 4556 admin_contact_country: AU (AUSTRALIA) admin_contact_phone: +61 75 4765069 admin_contact_fax: +61 75 4765069 admin_contact_email: scottmcvey2003(a)yahoo.com.au % technical_contact_name: Scott Mcvey technical_contact_address1: 23 Cicada Cl technical_contact_city: Buderim technical_contact_province: QLD technical_contact_postalcode: 4556 technical_contact_country: AU (AUSTRALIA) technical_contact_phone: +61 75 4765069 technical_contact_fax: +61 75 4765069 technical_contact_email: scottmcvey2003(a)yahoo.com.au % ns_name_01: ns1.rookdns.com ns_name_02: ns2.rookdns.com _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
-- Josh Bailey _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
Definitely. I think from memory the only restricted 2tlds are .iwi.nz , .
cri.nz , .govt.nz and .mil.nz .
And I for one think things are fine as they currently are.
Dave
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Don Gould
On 22/07/2011 12:01 p.m., Charlie Bailey wrote:
Which therefore begs the question: Should the .ac.nz and .school.nz 2LDs be moderated?
Sorry? Are you saying I can currently register MyWordsOfChoice.ac.nz or MyWordsOfChoice.school.nz?
______________________________**_________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/**mailman/listinfo/nznoghttp://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
add health and govt and your right
http://dnc.org.nz/story/moderated-second-level-domains
Cheers,
Hugh
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:25:17 +1200, Dave Mill
Definitely. I think from memory the only restricted 2tlds are .iwi.nz , . cri.nz , .govt.nz and .mil.nz .
And I for one think things are fine as they currently are.
Dave
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Don Gould
wrote: On 22/07/2011 12:01 p.m., Charlie Bailey wrote:
Which therefore begs the question: Should the .ac.nz and .school.nz
2LDs
be moderated?
Sorry? Are you saying I can currently register MyWordsOfChoice.ac.nz or MyWordsOfChoice.school.nz?
______________________________**_________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/**mailman/listinfo/nznoghttp://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
On 22 July 2011 10:25, Dave Mill
Definitely. I think from memory the only restricted 2tlds are .iwi.nz , . cri.nz , .govt.nz and .mil.nz .
.health.nz and . parliament.nz are both moderated too. http://dnc.org.nz/story/moderated-second-level-domains And I for one think things are fine as they currently are.
Me too. When registrations were handled by University of Waikato, .school.nzand . ac.nz were moderated. When Domainz took over admin of .nz, they were un moderated. IIRC[1], the reason was it was too hard to define what a school and academic institute were. -- simon [1] this was back in the 90s
On 22/07/11 12:29, Simon Green wrote:
Me too. When registrations were handled by University of Waikato, .school.nz http://school.nz and .ac.nz http://ac.nz were moderated. When Domainz took over admin of .nz, they were un moderated. IIRC[1], the reason was it was too hard to define what a school and academic institute were.
In reality, before ISOCNZ / Domainz took over, there was no "moderated" vs "unmoderated" dichotomy. All domain requests were eyeballed to some degree, as the updates were a completely manual process. In co.nz, they really just had to look kosher; other domains got higher levels of scrutiny, but there wasn't a really any formal policy around it. When ISOCNZ took responsibility for the domain updates, and things started to be automated to a greater degree, the initial plan was to make all domains unmoderated, and that is what happened to most of the domains that were mastered at UoW. The domains that were mastered at VUW (govt, mil, iwi) continued to be moderated, primarily due to rearguard action by VUW and Government folk. -- don
This is not a new issue. In 1998 I stood for election to ISOCNZ Council on a
platform that school.nz and ac.nz should be moderated. I got elected but
found out that no one actually wanted to be the moderator J
Current 2LDs are
Unmoderated -ac, co, geek, gen, maori, net, org, school
Moderated - cri, govt, health, iwi, mil, parliament
Archie is long dead!
DPF
From: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
[mailto:nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Dave Mill
Sent: Friday, 22 July 2011 12:25 p.m.
To: Don Gould
Cc: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
Subject: Re: [nznog] google.ac.nz
Definitely. I think from memory the only restricted 2tlds are .iwi.nz ,
.cri.nz , .govt.nz and .mil.nz .
And I for one think things are fine as they currently are.
Dave
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Don Gould
Failed to make it through the process from memory.
Sent from my iPhone
On 22/07/2011, at 12:44 PM, "Sam Sargeant"
nope, made it through the process but after three years was relinguished because noone wanted to use it. 8-| On 22/07/2011 12:47 p.m., Paul Brislen wrote:
Failed to make it through the process from memory.
Sent from my iPhone
On 22/07/2011, at 12:44 PM, "Sam Sargeant"
mailto:sam.sargeant(a)gmail.com> wrote: On 22/07/2011, at 12:37 PM, David Farrar wrote: Current 2LDs are
Unmoderated –ac, co, geek, gen, maori, net, org, school Moderated – cri, govt, health, iwi, mil, parliament
.. whatever happened to .bank.nz ?
Sam.
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nzmailto:NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
-- Frank March At home
A certain female systems administrator once had the e-mail address headmistress(a)sex.school.nz if my memory is correct! -----Original Message----- From: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Don Gould Sent: Friday, 22 July 2011 12:23 p.m. To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: Re: [nznog] google.ac.nz On 22/07/2011 12:01 p.m., Charlie Bailey wrote:
Which therefore begs the question: Should the .ac.nz and .school.nz 2LDs be moderated?
Sorry? Are you saying I can currently register MyWordsOfChoice.ac.nz or MyWordsOfChoice.school.nz? _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
On 22/07/11 12:01 PM, "Charlie Bailey"
Which therefore begs the question: Should the .ac.nz and .school.nz 2LDs be moderated?
Anyone need proz.ac.nz? (its able to be registered right now). If the domain becomes moderated in the future.. What happens to all the domains which are not education based places.. Yes.. The "Intent" was for academic for these 2 domains but they sometimes domains get used in "strange ways" Think about it.. People have been using domains names in not so standard ways for a long time. .co - columbia not company, .ms = Montserrat (not microsoft (example explore.ms)) .to = Tongo (example go.to) And LOTS of others..
There's a piece of me that just wants to respond 'why not'.....
But since you asked, my $0.02 (excl GST)...
The Communities of Interest described by the .school.nz and .ac.nz are
discrete communities imbued with a sense of I guess, trust or
respectability.....to me, entities using those 2LD's for mail or web
should 'do what it says on the tin', i.e. be schools or academic
institutions.
To quote the .health.nz moderation policy,
'The .health.nz namespace is moderated to preserve the authority of health and
disability sector websites and email addresses, and to enable easy
identification of the Sector on the Internet. This will give people
confidence that
they are dealing with bona fide health providers, improve security and
privacy of
patients? health information and simplify the implementation of health and
disability sector networking'
I think the same principle applies to .ac.nz and .school.nz.
Furthermore, there are registers of schools and academic institutions
maintained by organs of government
(minedu.govt.nz/nzqa.govt.nz/tec.govt.nz) that can be used as a
reference for eligibility.
I'd also refer to policies around the use of .edu, .k12.org and the
like in other jurisdictions.
Without oversimplifying, I think it comes back to maintaining the
integrity of the 2LD for its community of interest; I think there's an
inherent requirement for that integrity to be maintained for these two
2LDs in addition to the currently moderated ones, an integrity
requirement that isn't present for the remainder of the .nz 2LDs.
I do wonder what minedu.govt.nz's official view on this is....
Quoting "Andy Linton"
On 22/07/11 Fri, Jul 22, 12:01, Charlie Bailey wrote:
Which therefore begs the question: Should the .ac.nz and .school.nz 2LDs be moderated?
Why?
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
In the real world you're allowed to operate any kind of school that teaches
anything that you like and there are little to no controls on this.
Restricting ac.nz to government approved schools wouldn't reflect this
situation.
On 22 July 2011 14:33, Charlie Bailey
There's a piece of me that just wants to respond 'why not'.....
But since you asked, my $0.02 (excl GST)...
The Communities of Interest described by the .school.nz and .ac.nz are discrete communities imbued with a sense of I guess, trust or respectability.....to me, entities using those 2LD's for mail or web should 'do what it says on the tin', i.e. be schools or academic institutions.
To quote the .health.nz moderation policy,
'The .health.nz namespace is moderated to preserve the authority of health and disability sector websites and email addresses, and to enable easy identification of the Sector on the Internet. This will give people confidence that they are dealing with bona fide health providers, improve security and privacy of patients? health information and simplify the implementation of health and disability sector networking'
I think the same principle applies to .ac.nz and .school.nz. Furthermore, there are registers of schools and academic institutions maintained by organs of government (minedu.govt.nz/nzqa.govt.nz/**tec.govt.nzhttp://minedu.govt.nz/nzqa.govt.nz/tec.govt.nz) that can be used as a reference for eligibility.
I'd also refer to policies around the use of .edu, .k12.org and the like in other jurisdictions.
Without oversimplifying, I think it comes back to maintaining the integrity of the 2LD for its community of interest; I think there's an inherent requirement for that integrity to be maintained for these two 2LDs in addition to the currently moderated ones, an integrity requirement that isn't present for the remainder of the .nz 2LDs.
I do wonder what minedu.govt.nz's official view on this is....
Quoting "Andy Linton"
: On 22/07/11 Fri, Jul 22, 12:01, Charlie Bailey wrote:
Which therefore begs the question: Should the .ac.nz and .school.nz 2LDs be moderated?
Why?
______________________________**_________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/**mailman/listinfo/nznoghttp://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
______________________________**_________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/**mailman/listinfo/nznoghttp://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
Two cases:
1. There is no concern about the quality/trustibility of the .school.nzor .
ac.nz namespace. The status quo is fine.
2. If we wish to promote the idea that similar to the health.nz example
that .school and .ac should be recognized registered institution then .
co.nz or org.nz should be fine for non-registered schools.
The second option obviously requires work: setting an agreeable standard and
getting some one consistent act to moderator.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Justin Cook
In the real world you're allowed to operate any kind of school that teaches anything that you like and there are little to no controls on this. Restricting ac.nz to government approved schools wouldn't reflect this situation.
On 22 July 2011 14:33, Charlie Bailey
wrote: There's a piece of me that just wants to respond 'why not'.....
But since you asked, my $0.02 (excl GST)...
The Communities of Interest described by the .school.nz and .ac.nz are discrete communities imbued with a sense of I guess, trust or respectability.....to me, entities using those 2LD's for mail or web should 'do what it says on the tin', i.e. be schools or academic institutions.
To quote the .health.nz moderation policy,
'The .health.nz namespace is moderated to preserve the authority of health and disability sector websites and email addresses, and to enable easy identification of the Sector on the Internet. This will give people confidence that they are dealing with bona fide health providers, improve security and privacy of patients? health information and simplify the implementation of health and disability sector networking'
I think the same principle applies to .ac.nz and .school.nz. Furthermore, there are registers of schools and academic institutions maintained by organs of government (minedu.govt.nz/nzqa.govt.nz/** tec.govt.nz http://minedu.govt.nz/nzqa.govt.nz/tec.govt.nz) that can be used as a reference for eligibility.
I'd also refer to policies around the use of .edu, .k12.org and the like in other jurisdictions.
Without oversimplifying, I think it comes back to maintaining the integrity of the 2LD for its community of interest; I think there's an inherent requirement for that integrity to be maintained for these two 2LDs in addition to the currently moderated ones, an integrity requirement that isn't present for the remainder of the .nz 2LDs.
I do wonder what minedu.govt.nz's official view on this is....
Quoting "Andy Linton"
: On 22/07/11 Fri, Jul 22, 12:01, Charlie Bailey wrote:
Which therefore begs the question: Should the .ac.nz and .school.nz 2LDs be moderated?
Why?
______________________________**_________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/**mailman/listinfo/nznoghttp://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
______________________________**_________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/**mailman/listinfo/nznoghttp://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Andy Linton
On 22/07/11 Fri, Jul 22, 12:01, Charlie Bailey wrote:
Which therefore begs the question: Should the .ac.nz and .school.nz 2LDs be moderated?
Why?
Also - I've been using my school.nz for over 11 years, would I get grandfathered in to acceptance and would only new applications get moderated? Or would I be forced to change everything I have that uses this domain along with the hundreds of places I've used my email to register etc. by relinquishing the registration and using some other unmoderated tld/2ld?
On Thursday 21 July 2011 16:16:30 Jim Cheetham wrote:
The wider question -- should google.ac.nz even exist?
No, it's a registered trademark. I've let Google know and they can decide whether to make a complaint with the DNC. It's certainly diverting traffic from people intending to visit them so they'll probably be annoyed. Cheers, Tim
On 23/07/11 1:25 PM, "Timothy Goddard"
On Thursday 21 July 2011 16:16:30 Jim Cheetham wrote:
The wider question -- should google.ac.nz even exist?
No, it's a registered trademark. I've let Google know and they can decide whether to make a complaint with the DNC. It's certainly diverting traffic from people intending to visit them so they'll probably be annoyed.
This has nothing to do with the DNC. They won't hand the domain over to google at all just because Google asked. If "Google Inc" want the domain they will have to offer "Scott Mcvey" money for it or take the case to www.wipo.int or alike in New Zealand. Saying all this.. IP means nothing if companies don't go after anyone. (tardme.co.nz for example. Seems like empty threats from Trademe (if the email is real (click on the picture))
Cheers,
Tim _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
On Saturday, 23 July 2011, Craig Whitmore
On 23/07/11 1:25 PM, "Timothy Goddard"
wrote: On Thursday 21 July 2011 16:16:30 Jim Cheetham wrote:
The wider question -- should google.ac.nz even exist?
No, it's a registered trademark. I've let Google know and they can decide whether to make a complaint with the DNC. It's certainly diverting traffic from people intending to visit them so they'll probably be annoyed.
This has nothing to do with the DNC. They won't hand the domain over to google at all just because Google asked.
If "Google Inc" want the domain they will have to offer "Scott Mcvey" money for it or take the case to www.wipo.int or alike in New Zealand.
The DNC have their own dispute resolution process, which i would suggest (IANAL) Google would be successful in. http://dnc.org.nz/story/drs-home -- simon
The DNC certainly won't hand a domain over to Google upon request, but also
WIPO has no jurisdiction over .nz domains.
Google could lodge a complaint with the .nz dispute resolution service at
http://dnc.org.nz/story/drs-home if they were unhappy.
DPF
-----Original Message-----
From: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
[mailto:nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Craig Whitmore
Sent: Saturday, 23 July 2011 1:55 p.m.
To: Timothy Goddard; nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
Subject: Re: [nznog] google.ac.nz
On 23/07/11 1:25 PM, "Timothy Goddard"
On Thursday 21 July 2011 16:16:30 Jim Cheetham wrote:
The wider question -- should google.ac.nz even exist?
No, it's a registered trademark. I've let Google know and they can decide whether to make a complaint with the DNC. It's certainly diverting traffic from people intending to visit them so they'll probably be annoyed.
This has nothing to do with the DNC. They won't hand the domain over to google at all just because Google asked. If "Google Inc" want the domain they will have to offer "Scott Mcvey" money for it or take the case to www.wipo.int or alike in New Zealand. Saying all this.. IP means nothing if companies don't go after anyone. (tardme.co.nz for example. Seems like empty threats from Trademe (if the email is real (click on the picture))
Cheers,
Tim _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
participants (21)
-
Andy Linton
-
Charlie Bailey
-
Craig Whitmore
-
Dave Mill
-
David Farrar
-
Don Gould
-
Don Stokes
-
Frank March
-
Hugh Davenport
-
Jay Daley
-
Jim Cheetham
-
Josh Bailey
-
Justin Cook
-
Kyle Henderson
-
Nicholas Lee
-
Paul Brislen
-
Peter Mott
-
Sam Sargeant
-
Simon Green
-
Simon Lyall
-
Timothy Goddard