1.1.1.1.1: The Clock is Ticking on IPv4!
_______________________________________________________________________ 1.1.1.1.1: The Clock is Ticking on IPv4! _______________________________________________________________________ Hi NZNOG Community, Following up on the APNIC 30 Community Consultation: The Final Stages of IPv4 Distribution, the APNIC Secretariat has created an information repository on IPv4 exhaustion in the Asia Pacific region: http://www.apnic.net/ipv4-exhaustion This section of the public website contains important information relevant to network operators, business managers, and end-users. It is now possible for anyone to keep track of IPv4 availability at APNIC. This information is designed to keep everyone updated as we prepare to enact the final /8 policy, which will ensure there is enough IPv4 address space for everyone to transition to IPv6. Please take the time to visit this area of the website. We are looking forward to supporting you in a smooth transition from IPv4 to IPv6. _______________________________________________________________________ APNIC Secretariat secretariat(a)apnic.net Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 PO Box 3646 South Brisbane, QLD 4101 Australia Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD http://www.apnic.net _______________________________________________________________________ * Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary.
Speaking of that, I've come across 1.1.1.1 in several places in NZ, most recently as the default router on the wireless network in Rotorua public library. Is it time for a little campaign to get rid of this heresy? Brian
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Brian E Carpenter < brian.e.carpenter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Speaking of that, I've come across 1.1.1.1 in several places in NZ, most recently as the default router on the wireless network in Rotorua public library.
Is it time for a little campaign to get rid of this heresy?
Probably not, presuming it's a /24 or similar network. APNIC has already blacklisted 1.1.1.0/24 (and a few other networks from the 1/8 network), so whilst using it as basically private address space definitely isn't recommended, it shouldn't cause any issues going forward. If they are using 1.0.0.0/8 or something more than just a /24 then it's definitely worthy of some action. Scott.
On 01/11/2011 03:53 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Speaking of that, I've come across 1.1.1.1 in several places in NZ, most recently as the default router on the wireless network in Rotorua public library.
Is it time for a little campaign to get rid of this heresy?
I wonder whether there is some techie in Rotorua who has been recommending such a setup. I found the same at the Duxton Hotel, also in the Rotorua area. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Glen and Rosanne Eustace, GodZone Internet Services, a division of AGRE Enterprises Ltd., P.O. Box 8020, Palmerston North, New Zealand 4446 Ph: +64 6 357 8168, Fax: +64 6 357 8165, Mob: +64 27 542 4015 "A Ministry specialising in providing low-cost professional Internet Services to NZ Christian Churches, Ministries and Organisations"
On 12/01/2011, at 7:16, Glen Eustace
On 01/11/2011 03:53 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Speaking of that, I've come across 1.1.1.1 in several places in NZ, most recently as the default router on the wireless network in Rotorua public library.
Is it time for a little campaign to get rid of this heresy?
I wonder whether there is some techie in Rotorua who has been recommending such a setup. I found the same at the Duxton Hotel, also in the Rotorua area.
Alas try vendor. Cisco had it as a virtual address on their wireless controllers. I believe this is no longer the default, but of course there are all these networks out there that were set and forget, or people simply don't know better/don't care. -- Neil Fenemor Señor Network Engineer FX Networks (m) 021 978 078 (e) neil.fenemor(a)fx.net.nz (w) http://www.fx.net.nz/ (p) 04 498 9565 (f) 04 498 9649 Level 3 FX Networks House 138 The Terrace Wellington
Neil, On 2011-01-12 08:17, Neil Fenemor wrote:
On 12/01/2011, at 7:16, Glen Eustace
wrote: On 01/11/2011 03:53 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Speaking of that, I've come across 1.1.1.1 in several places in NZ, most recently as the default router on the wireless network in Rotorua public library.
Is it time for a little campaign to get rid of this heresy? I wonder whether there is some techie in Rotorua who has been recommending such a setup. I found the same at the Duxton Hotel, also in the Rotorua area.
Alas try vendor. Cisco had it as a virtual address on their wireless controllers. I believe this is no longer the default, but of course there are all these networks out there that were set and forget, or people simply don't know better/don't care.
Unfortunately I failed to notice the netmask when I was in Rotorua. Do you happen to know whether they advertise 1.1.1.0/24 or something shorter? If it's shorter, something may need to be done, as Scott said. Brian
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Brian E Carpenter
Unfortunately I failed to notice the netmask when I was in Rotorua. Do you happen to know whether they advertise 1.1.1.0/24 or something shorter? If it's shorter, something may need to be done, as Scott said.
Brian
I think this is a standard hotspot gateway that's actually rather widespread throughout NZ. I came across a couple when on holiday before Xmas. One was at Ariti, a bay at the South of Lake Taupo. People are encouraged to login to http://1.1.1.1/ to do the authentication bit . Fortunately the subnet was only a /24 . I forget the name of the company that runs the hotspot though :( Dave
participants (6)
-
Brian E Carpenter
-
Dave Mill
-
Elly Tawhai
-
Glen Eustace
-
Neil Fenemor
-
Scott Howard