[Reply] HI all, I had a conversation over dinner with an ECPAT person some years ago. While doing good work, they seemed to believe that because technology allowed images to be scanned for "flesh colours" then every email, attachment, and website should be filtered. I tried to explain technology and cost issues, and then the fact that any system, once implemented, would/could be easily bypassed by the "perverts", leaving Joe Public to pay the costs for an expensive white elephant. There was also blindness to the possible abuses by the operators of such a system, particularly where the filtering rules are hidden. So we may well have a case of political operators riding the "noble cause(s)". So we best be aware here. The slippery slope is indeed already well oiled. cheers Gary At 11:54 on 17/02/2010 you wrote
To : nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz CC : >From: Florent Bouron, florentb(a)securify.co.nz Content Type: text/html Attached: image0011234567891011121314.png
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Am I the only one to spot that they're going to use a _Content_ filter to actually filter URLs?
A content filter is able to scan the pages for offending material, when they talk about installing a black list of web sites.
And a content filter has got far bigger technical challenges than just filtering URLs and IPs ... or are they giving themselves the ability to deploy further and smarter filtering in the future?
From: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of McDonald Richards Sent: Wednesday, 17 February 2010 11:45 a.m. To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: Re: [nznog] DIA Filters
Out of curiosity does the NZ list also contain RC (refused classification) material or is it purely child pornography - or are people being kept in the dark about the exact contents of the list? Is it as useless as the proposed AU one which will only stop HTTP?
I guess you can say this is an issue close to all of our hearts (Aussies that is) at the moment - both because of the wasted tax payers money (what good is a filter that doesn't work) and the ability for our government to censor what the public servants perceive as restricted content at whim!
Macca
From: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Tony Wicks Sent: Wednesday, 17 February 2010 9:25 AM To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: [nznog] DIA Filters
I don't suppose anyone is prepared to comment on If particular ISP's intend to adopt whatever this is ?
<http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/NZ-s-filter-starts-next-mon th/0,130061791,339301140,00.htm> http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/NZ-s-filter-starts-next-mont h/0,130061791,339301140,00.htm
Tony Wicks | Network Architect Team Leader DDI +64 9 978 8328 | Mobile +64 21 965362
Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may >be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you may >not read, use, copy or disclose this email. If you are not the >intended recipient, please let us know by reply e-mail >immediately and then delete this email from your system. We shall >not be responsible for any changes to, or interception of, this >email or any attachment after it leaves our information systems. >We accept no responsibility for viruses or defects in this email >or any attachments.
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
Ref#: 41006
On 17 February 2010 12:14, Gary T. Benner
[snip] So we best be aware here. The slippery slope is indeed already well oiled.
cheers Gary
I'm not convinced that discussions of naked network engineers playing on an oiled up slip and slide are appropriate given the sensitive nature of the discussion. On another note... WHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!! Can go first!? Cheers - N :-)
participants (2)
-
Gary T. Benner
-
Neil Gardner