NZNOG People, OK, I asked for further feedback and now I've got some. Quite a lot actually. With a certain amount of interpretation on my part (e.g. all cases of "I'll bring along some other people" interpreted as "I'll bring along one other person"), I believe that we have something like this: Potential attendees volunteering: 21 Potential attendees volunteered by others: 7 Offers to provide or be speaker(s): 7 Offer to help organise speakers: 1 Offers to help organise: 5 Offers of venue: 4 Offer of sponsorship (i.e. money): 1 Offer of exhibition network equipment: 1 There have been relatively few statements of preference as to location: Auckland: 3 Wellington: 3 With UniForum NZ: 2 Hawke's Bay: 1 Outside Auckland and Wellington: 1 Interpreting the comments of two University of Waikato staff as votes for Hamilton would not clarify that picture any. I'm impressed. All of that in three days. We do appear to have enough interest to justify proceeding to planning a specific event. In doing that we face a number of inter-related decisions. 1/ Do we wish to restrict this to one day, or are we looking for a residential conference? I think this is the most important of the decisions. It has implications for cost, obviously, but also for where we do this and what sort of organisational structure is needed. A residential conference should probably be outside (though within reach of) Auckland or Wellington to keep costs down and to reduce the temptation to go back to work. Conversely, that can be expected to make it harder for some people to attend. I'm assuming that we do want a national event rather than local meetings over drinks, but if that's not the case, now's the time to say so. I'm also assuming that multicasting is an add-on to a physical event, not a substitute for one. 2/ Are we happy to have a vendor provide a venue? There has been at least one quite feasible, as well as generous, offer from a vendor. Whether this is even an issue depends on the answer to the previous question. 3/ How often are we planning to do this? Should we be thinking big on the basis that this is a once-a-year thing, or are we trying to keep the scale down so that it will be repeatable more often? This is closely related to cost, in money and time to organise. See also question 1. 4/ How much emphasis do we want to place on construction of a laboratory/exhibition network as opposed to paper sessions? More hands-on fiddling means the option of having attendees have stuff explained to them as they do it, but requires a longer event. My Opinion: "The opinions expressed in this programme are bloody good ones." - F. Dagg I wish us to be very conservative in what we expect from the team of people we put together to organise this. I believe that if we choose a residential event we should piggyback it into UniForum NZ's event and seek to have them do a fair amount of the work for us. Conversely, if we choose a one-day event we should seek to cooperate with a host organisation - whether an education institution or a company - while ensuring that a NZNOG committee (yes, sorry, it has come to that) retains control over the programme. In either case a certain amount of exposure for vendors is to be expected. As to frequency, I'm inclined to go for as large an event as we think we can manage, and worry about the next one after we've learned about running one. Others may think differently. I believe that the composition of the committee/team/chain gang will vary depending on exactly what we're trying to achieve. So I'd like to see some discussion of these questions, and others that seem relevant _to potential attendees_ before we try to work out who's going to be asked to take the next steps. I'd hope for some clearer idea of where we're going within the next few days. - Donald Neal ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you." ============================================================================== - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Donald Neal wrote:
We do appear to have enough interest to justify proceeding to planning a specific event. In doing that we face a number of inter-related decisions.
1/ Do we wish to restrict this to one day, or are we looking for a residential conference?
Residential but no more than two days. Venue needs to be somewhere with a reasonable airport closeby preferably with cheap airfares.
2/ Are we happy to have a vendor provide a venue? There has been at least one quite feasible, as well as generous, offer from a vendor. Whether this is even an issue depends on the answer to the previous question.
I'm content with that as long as it doesn't become something like the "Microsoft Weenies", "Cisco Kids" or "Juniper Berries" NZ Network Meeting. It's important that the meeting is vendor/provider neutral so that criticism of or complements to particular vendors/providers can be voiced. It would be really good if sponsorship came from multiple sources.
3/ How often are we planning to do this? Should we be thinking big on the basis that this is a once-a-year thing, or are we trying to keep the scale down so that it will be repeatable more often? This is closely related to cost, in money and time to organise. See also question 1.
Once a year but keep the scale down as well.
4/ How much emphasis do we want to place on construction of a laboratory/exhibition network as opposed to paper sessions? More hands-on fiddling means the option of having attendees have stuff explained to them as they do it, but requires a longer event.
Choose a venue that has a network we can use. Otherwise you have people having to arrive in advance to set up the network and stay behind afterwards to take it down. I'd have thought that this group was sufficiently au fait with setting up networks that this was a bit of a busman's holiday. This advice has been independantly valued at 7c. - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
Ok - I wrote all of the rest of this and then it occured to me. "I talk too much" There are hundreds of you on this list and it's the same ones talking all the time. Either you all agree with us, you are too scared to pipe up or you just don't care. In reality it's probably none of these. But do get some input. You can't come across any more crazy than Juha =) Anyway, I said I talked too much, I didn't say I was about to stop doing it. On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 10:03:47AM +1300, Donald Neal wrote:
1/ Do we wish to restrict this to one day, or are we looking for a residential conference? I think this is the most important of the decisions. It has implications for cost, obviously, but also for where we do this and what sort of organisational structure is needed. A residential conference should probably be outside (though within reach of) Auckland or Wellington to keep costs down and to reduce the temptation to go back to work. Conversely, that can be expected to make it harder for some people to attend. I'm assuming that we do want a national event rather than local meetings over drinks, but if that's not the case, now's the time to say so. I'm also assuming that multicasting is an add-on to a physical event, not a substitute for one.
Hmmmmm resisential, but I have some issues. One of the things that I want to see out of this conference is that it fosters interest in 'up-and-coming' network people. I never want this to turn into an old boys club, nor do I want it to be restricted to people from the few large companies. If you have a 3-4 day conference in Auckland, then a Wellington company will send one or two people if they are a large company, or zero if they are small. I want a conference where everyone can come along and not feel like they are not welcome there. I want the guy who works on the helpdesk but likes to play with networks at home to be as able to front up as the CTO of a major carrier. Lofty goals I know - but this is the time to start. How do we do this? well I don't really know. But the cost has to be low. I'd say ditch the overseas speakers if they want free airfair etc. There are enough inteligent people in NZ who can contribute to this. It would be great to see overseas people there, but which would you rather see. a) Room full of only the people who can fly to anywhere in the country and pay $400, all drooling over the latest International Guru? or b) Room full of anyone who wants to attend, all on an equal footing, all learning from what each other has to offer. Which one of these fits the culture of this list better? There have been times in the past where it has been mooted that the list be closed or a new one created that just allows "Major Network Operators" access. This is one of those times, and a direction needs to be chosen. Well that or Donald needs to tell me that it's not an "either/or" thing again and I get to sit down and shut up =)
2/ Are we happy to have a vendor provide a venue? There has been at least one quite feasible, as well as generous, offer from a vendor. Whether this is even an issue depends on the answer to the previous question.
Nope - Absolutely not. In no way, shape or form. At all, ever Well ok - but only if it's Juniper and no other vendors can have any logo's there. Well ok - small logo's but they are not allowed to give away any stuff, and the venue has to be called "Juniper Wonderland". Well alright, I'll ditch the name. And I spose that other vendors might be able to give away small things, as long as none of them is in any way cool or useful. And I have to be able to get up and make a huge speach about how good our gear is and what our corporate direction is. Alright, alright. I won't talk. You can have it at a Juniper facility. I'll let any other vendor give away whatever they want and advertise however they want. And make no demands on what they can and can't do. (This does not constitute an offer for a Juniper facility) But my point is made. *puts on vendor hat* I would not mind having it at a vendors venue. But it has to be a level playing field. I've been told before that I can't give stuff away at a vendor's venue. This goes against the spirit of the thing and will be unacceptable this time. Vendors can be strange beasts about branding and corporate image. Vendors making offers of venues should do so out of goodwill and not advertising. They should also be VERY open to the idea of allowing competeing vendors equal access to advertising/branding space *takes off hat* See the can of worms this opens? Do you see now? =) *takes pills, calms down*
3/ How often are we planning to do this? Should we be thinking big on the basis that this is a once-a-year thing, or are we trying to keep the scale down so that it will be repeatable more often? This is closely related to cost, in money and time to organise. See also question 1.
I'm torn. *one hand* A big one is really the way to go *other hand* IF we try to organise it and it ends up being too big for us, then it will just suck. Is there somewhere in the middle that we can start for the first year?
4/ How much emphasis do we want to place on construction of a laboratory/exhibition network as opposed to paper sessions? More hands-on fiddling means the option of having attendees have stuff explained to them as they do it, but requires a longer event.
Interesting thought. A large hands on component would be good. Don't want this to turn into a vendor bake-off though. Someone mentioned before that there would have to be a network there for people to use while they were there. Well having set up a Uniforum network one year can say that it was hard work. Nowdays that venue's have a bit more wiring it could be easier, but I think wireless is the go here. (What? Dean wanted to use wireless? He said it was insecure) Yeah yeah yeah. But so is any conference lan. So here's what I want. I want a vendor/company to come forward and offer to lend us some base stations. Offer to lease out cards to people who need them. And I also want a telco/ISP to cough up the free connection for the duration. There - thats not too much to ask is it? =) Dean - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Dean Pemberton wrote:
It would be great to see overseas people there, but which would you rather see.
a) Room full of only the people who can fly to anywhere in the country and pay $400, all drooling over the latest International Guru? or b) Room full of anyone who wants to attend, all on an equal footing, all learning from what each other has to offer.
Something in the middle. When we've done things like this at the university in the past the cost has been between $100 and $200. It could be less if vendors sponsor food/drinks bandwidth etc. If we hosted the event we would sponsor someone from NLANR or CAIDA to come (not quite drooling material, but generally worth listening too.) Accommodation and social extra (say $75 and $50). Tony - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
Ok then I'll chip in at this point having read the whole thread so far.... At 11:38 11/01/02 +1300, Dean Pemberton wrote:
One of the things that I want to see out of this conference is that it fosters interest in 'up-and-coming' network people. I never want this to turn into an old boys club, nor do I want it to be restricted to people from the few large companies. [snip] I want a conference where everyone can come along and not feel like they are not welcome there. I want the guy who works on the helpdesk but likes to play with networks at home to be as able to front up as the CTO of a major carrier. Lofty goals I know - but this is the time to start.
this is where I fit in... I've been lurking on nznog for a while now - I don't REALLY fit the mold of Network Operator but I run a small lan of twenty Linux and Windows machines in a cybercafe and we "do" email addresses and host web sites... there's a lot I've learned from folks on this list (thanks guys) and I'm always interested in attending something where I might pick up some useful info that will make my life easier :-D I've not attended any of the other "open" invitation meetings in the past as they seemed to be for the "Real Pros"... I could be tempted to attend this (or even send my one employee... or better still we could BOTH attend) there 's lots more I agree with in Dean's email but I also want to comment on Kefyn's comments on what is the purpose... I think this is a prerequisite that needs to be identified... if I'm going to attend then I want to know what the ultimate purpose of a "conference" is... an excuse (sorry read reason) for another booze up?... exchange of knowledge, dicussions on issues..... so define the purpose, THEN worry about venues, vendor support, etc.... Ian - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
There have been relatively few statements of preference as to location:
Auckland: 3
+1 I'd say with a good lead time (July) you'll get a few international attendees, please consider the extra travel some of us may have to go through... --- Terence C. Giufre-Sweetser +---------------------------------+--------------------------+ | TereDonn Telecommunications Ltd | Phone +61-[0]7-32369366 | | 1/128 Bowen St, SPRING HILL | FAX +61-[0]7-32369930 | | PO BOX 1054, SPRING HILL 4004 | Mobile +61-[0]414-663053 | | Queensland Australia | http://www.tdce.com.au | +---------------------------------+--------------------------+ - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
On Thursday 24 January 2002 04:52, you wrote:
There have been relatively few statements of preference as to location:
Auckland: 3
+1
My preference is for Auckland.
I'd say with a good lead time (July) you'll get a few international attendees, please consider the extra travel some of us may have to go through...
Yes, in 2000 I attended the Sydney Internet Service Providers Conference and Trade Show as a guest of a major Canadian .COM. That was very big and lasted 3 days. (It filled a reasonable part of the Darling Harbour Conference centre) It would be nice if we could work towards having something like that locally- some time. Best regards, Michael Hallager Managing Director Comsolve Networks (NZ) Limited E-Mail: michael(a)comsolve.net.nz Website: http://www.comsolve.net.nz Proudly providing hosting exclusively to 100% family-safe content sites. - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
participants (7)
-
Andy Linton
-
Dean Pemberton
-
Donald Neal
-
Michael Hallager
-
PhoneNet
-
Terence Giufre-Sweetser
-
Tony McGregor