On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:55 PM Mel Beckman wrote:

bufferbloat is rarely fatal

This task will put me in my grave, sooner rather than later!

LOL! I know one person taht may disagree with that :)

-mel

On Dec 1, 2023, at 9:41 AM, Tom Mitchell wrote:

 Not sure we need the FCC telling us how to build products or run networks. Seat belts are life-or-death, but bufferbloat is rarely fatal ;-) Let it be a point of differentiation.

-- Tom

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 4:56 PM Dave Taht wrote:

...

Over here:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ADByjakzQXCj9Re_pUvrb5Qe5OK-QmhlYRLMBY4...

Us bufferbloat folk have been putting together a response to the FCC's NOI (notice of inquiry) asking for feedback as to increasing the broadband speeds beyond 100/20 Mbit.

"Calls for further bandwidth increases are analogous to calling for cars to have top speeds of 100, 200, or 500 miles per hour. Without calling also for better airbags, bumpers, brakes, or steering wheels, (or roads designed to minimize travel delay), these initiatives will fail (and are failing) to meet the needs of present and future users of the internet."

Comments (and cites) welcomed also! The text is still somewhat in flux...

-- :( My old R&D campus is up for sale: https://tinyurl.com/yurtlab Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos

-- :( My old R&D campus is up for sale: https://tinyurl.com/yurtlab Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos