Re: [nznog] Peering Issue - from a business point of view
p.s. I have NO affiliation with Maxnet I just use an email address from them.
What would that achieve? It won't solve the problem that John Russell brought up. There is NO need to set up any other peering exchanges.
You are confusing the issue. Get someone at the maxnet nog to explain it to you
HI Tikiri
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Tikiri Wicks wrote:
I realize that the APE and the WIX already exist but what I'm talking about is setting up a second peering point with different game rules. Namely Give as much as you take What would that achieve? It won't solve the problem that John Russell brought up. There is NO need to set up any other peering exchanges.
You are confusing the issue. Get someone at the maxnet nog to explain it to you
What you guys don't seem to understand is that if all the smaller ISP's Maxnet, IHUG, Slingshot, etc.... were all combined into one (big lump)
is probably way more end consumers than what Telstra has. And probably enough to get Telecom thinking as well
regards lin
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Wicks"
To: "'Tikiri Wicks'" Cc: "'nznog'" Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:14 AM Subject: RE: [nznog] Peering Issue - Perhaps a solution I hate to mention the obvious Tikiri, but that already exsists, they are called APE and WIX.
-----Original Message----- From: Tikiri Wicks [mailto:tcwicks(a)maxnet.co.nz] Sent: Wednesday, 26 November 2003 11:13 a.m. To: Andy Linton; nznog Subject: [nznog] Peering Issue - Perhaps a solution
Just a thought here
Since most ISP's in NZ seem to be in agreement over this. What if instead of just blowing off steam:
Everyone joins hands and sets up two (or more) peering exchanges.
One in
Auckland and one in Wellington. Then everyone simply drops all peering with Telstra (and / or Telecom if and where relevant) and interconnect
the two (or more) exchange points. The idea is that no one would pay for anything except for the cost of connectiong yourselves to the exchange points. Whether this be via tangent / united network / citylink / some big SDH radio link / microwave / a whole bunch of people running to the exchanges with buckets fileld with packets :)
Peering would be voluntary for anyone and on the condition that each provides the same amount of bandwidth under the same conditions from
network to the exchange as they do from teh exchange to their network.
That should keep players like Telecom and Telstra from trying to manipulate the market.
If Telstra want to peer they would be forced to do so at the same conditions that apply to everyone else
Also the costs of interconnectivity between the exchange points could be borne by the members based on some simple equation such as for example a ratio based on the amount of bandwidth with which they connect to the exchanges. Fill in the blanks here ________
Finally I would think that this would be a great opportunity for operators like tangent who have fibre running between the two (or more) hypothetical exchanges.
Cheers
Tikiri
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Linton"
To: "nznog" Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 10:53 AM Subject: [nznog] Peering at the APE and WIX - was Re: Irked with TelstraClear I posted some notes yesterday about peering with the APE and WIX route servers and gave a link for application forms which wasn't as useful as it might have been. For reference the forms are at:
http://www.citylink.co.nz/cgi-bin/wixape.pl?tmpl=ape.tmpl http://www.citylink.co.nz/cgi-bin/wixape.pl?tmpl=wix.tmpl
Joe Abley posted some ideas on peering - one obvious one that he hasn't gone the whole distance with is that if many of the small/medium
I'm not trying to look at it from a technical point. What I mean is purely
from a business point of view.
In that case what about if all the small ISP's as a group peer with one
layer 3 switch at the APE and another one at the WIX. This way Telstra would
have to peer with everyone or not peer with anyone.
New Zealand Internet consumers have great interest in other Internet related
services and web sites in New Zealand. For example the earlier reference to
nzdating.co.nz
A large portion of these New Zealand based ineternet services and websites
are physically hosted by ISP's other than Telstra and Telecom. Not to
mention the end consumers themselves.
If all the non Telco ISP's were to be lumped into one pile that would be a
lot of such internet services and web sites.
If all of these were as a group with rules that state peer with the all or
do not peer at all. Essentially a gigabit Layer 3 switch at the NEW
exchange. What this means is that parties would not peer with individual
small ISP's rather they would peer with the entire group.
In this scenario what would happen ?
A Telstra consumer tries to access www.nzdating.co.nz what happens ? it is
not accessible for them. The next day (or same day) he/she whines to his/her
friends about nzdating not beign there. But his/her friend is on a dialup to
ICONZ / Slingshot / _____ and they could access the site with no hassles.
Instant conclusion is something is wrong with Telstra.
The Telstra consumer would most probably switch to his friends connection.
The key is to achieve critical mass. You guys can only achieve this critical
mass as a group. Not as individual companies as you are too small alone to
make any difference. Only as a group.
Cheers
Tikiri
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lin Nah"
work together they will be in a better position to negotiate peering with the two large telcos.
Consider the stories here:
http://www.tomsdomain.com/aesop/id17.htm
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
I can totally understand JSR's anger at Telstra, How ever your example of nzdating.co.nz I personally think is a little harsh. I would wonder what Telstra would say about that, Also I believe that ISP's & the Admins that do the great job keeping the networks running have a responcibility not only to their own company but to the NZ Internet in general to keep things working for all internet users. The customer should not suffer, Its not their fault. Best regards Matthew G Brown B & R Holdings LIMITED Nelson, New Zealand DDI: + 64 3 544 9116 MOB: 027 4807731 http://www.brh.co.nz http://www.backupserver.co.nz -----Original Message----- From: Tikiri Wicks [mailto:tcwicks(a)maxnet.co.nz] Sent: Wednesday, 26 November 2003 12:19 p.m. To: 'nznog' Subject: Re: [nznog] Peering Issue - from a business point of view In this scenario what would happen ? A Telstra consumer tries to access www.nzdating.co.nz what happens ? it is not accessible for them. The next day (or same day) he/she whines to his/her friends about nzdating not beign there. But his/her friend is on a dialup to ICONZ / Slingshot / _____ and they could access the site with no hassles. Instant conclusion is something is wrong with Telstra.
[Everything in this email is my own uninformed personal opinion, and has absolutely nothing to do with TelstraClear's official position on anything at all. I'm not involved in any of this stuff, so don't quote me on anything, kthx] On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Tikiri Wicks wrote:
In that case what about if all the small ISP's as a group peer with one layer 3 switch at the APE and another one at the WIX. This way Telstra would have to peer with everyone or not peer with anyone.
Ah, but what happens when they choose not to peer with this group? And then what happens when Telecom takes a similar line? All of a sudden you've got a bunch of ISP's who are paying for international bandwidth through one of the other providers like AT&T, probably per byte, and they're having to use that bw to transit domestic traffic to everyone else. The problem is that the people making these decisions DO have reasons for making these changes... the reasons may be totally commercially based and have nothing to do with the feelgood ethos of the internet, but if the suits at TelstraClear are having those thoughts, I'll bet you a dollar there is someone in a suit at Telecom thinking "hey... if they can do it, so can we... and if we both do it, then everyone else will HAVE to buy a connection".
If all the non Telco ISP's were to be lumped into one pile that would be a lot of such internet services and web sites.
But remember, only the people who do not already have a TelstraClear service are potentially at risk of having their peering cut (according to jsr's quoted statement from Mathew Bolland).... How many of the non-telco ISP's in NZ don't have a TelstraClear link? How about if you add in the theory that Telecom takes the same line? All of a sudden your group of people is a whole lot smaller. While its nice to think that many ISP's will join your group trying to force peering, I think you'll find that many of them are still run by people who are more concerned about their business continuing and can't afford to take commercial risks just to uphold the ethos.
If all of these were as a group with rules that state peer with the all or do not peer at all. Essentially a gigabit Layer 3 switch at the NEW exchange. What this means is that parties would not peer with individual small ISP's rather they would peer with the entire group.
aka... the route servers?
The Telstra consumer would most probably switch to his friends connection.
I think there would be more to it than that. Especially if Telecom took the same line, thus forcing all the non-telco ISP's to use more expensive bw, and charge their customers international rates for what should be domestic traffic. I haven't been involved with any of this peering stuff, but my feeling is that perhaps (as Tony implied), there is a lot more to this than people realise, and in fact its not just TelstraClear trying to be big and bad. --- Matt Camp
participants (3)
-
Matt Camp
-
Matthew G Brown
-
Tikiri Wicks