On Tue, Sep 22, 1998 at 02:11:09PM +1000, Dean Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 1998 at 03:56:42PM +1200, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 1998 at 03:38:16PM +1200, Joe Abley wrote:
Unless the remote site happens to have a machine on their internal network, reachable by their mail relay, numbered 10.99.98.97 :)
0 chance of having that. (Statistically speaking, allowing for rounding errors).
Guess we're right off the end of the bell curve then :) How about...
127.0.0.2?
'fraid not - there are devices that use 127.0.0.2 as a valid address.
To paraphrase the Hitchiker's Guide: "this is some new meaning of the term 'valid' with which I was hitherto unacquainted" I guess what you REALLY want to do is locate the address used by the spammers and MX that. ;-) --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
On Tue, 22 Sep 1998, Michael Newbery wrote:
I guess what you REALLY want to do is locate the address used by the spammers and MX that. ;-)
<grin> I couldn't find that, but I do know the address of the open relay they used to spam - perhaps they'd like a hog of email as an incentive to sort their lives out? :-) Cheers Si --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
participants (2)
-
Michael Newbery -
Simon Blake