InternetNZ releases ENUM Personal User Agent Prototype software u nder Open Source BSD Licence.
InternetNZ releases ENUM Personal User Agent Prototype software under Open Source BSD Licence. http://www.internetnz.net.nz/public/enum/pua/2005-07-pua-media-release.html InternetNZ announced today the release of its ENUM "Personal User Agent" prototype source code under an Open Source BSD Licence. The release hopes to encourage developer support of an ENUM initiative in New Zealand. The code is available from http://www.internetnz.net.nz/public/enum, as well as Reports prepared by the Task Force and a limited quantity of CDs. Subscribe to a public information list at http://farsight.internetnz.net.nz/mailman/listinfo/enum. ENUM is a set of Internet protocols, mapping telephone numbers onto the Internet naming system. Existing email addresses, web sites and alternate telephone contact addresses can be attached to this ENUM record. This record can be used by suitable handsets or (pabx type) computer programs to contact the number holder. ENUM is in government approved trial or production in approximately 30 countries. "Personal User Agents" (PUA) are software programs which act like firewalls; automatically filtering requests for ENUM contact information and deciding what information to release and how incoming calls will be directed based on rules that look at the inbound identity of the caller. This protects the consumer from address harvesting or privacy breaches. In theory every existing and future telephone number in the world could be ENUM provisioned. This provides a massive legacy base on which commercial PUA software can be built. Following completion of an ENUM PUA UCI Feasibility Study at the beginning of 2005 the prototype was developed by Catalyst IT (http://www.catalyst.net.nz), of Wellington, for InternetNZ. The PUA prototype was linked to another module known as the "Universal Communications Identifier" (UCI) which can bind an individual's name and service requirements to ENUM records and then be accessed by other PUAs. InternetNZ's combination of PUA, UCI and ENUM has attracted the interest of Europe's Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) who have referred InternetNZ's work to the European Commission. Future ENUM PUA software will enable users to opt-in to security services that will restrict publication of contact (email etc) information to anonymous callers and will permit intelligent routing of calls based on the relationship of the receiver to the caller and possible cost optimization of call termination and also increasing the rate of successful call completion for the networks. There are significant international opportunities for software developers to incorporate ENUM with PUA features into their existing communications software and directory services. InternetNZ anticipate that a number of software companies will work co-operatively to develop compatible systems that will compliment each other on different niche markets such as PUAs in the Telco-network, ISP, corporate business, SoHo and individual markets. Co-operating with the Government, Telecommunication Carriers Forum and applications developers, InternetNZ will participate and facilitate a New Zealand ENUM Trial over the next year that will provide a platform to test, demonstrate, commercialize applications and integrate ENUM to deliver economic advantage to the New Zealand community. InternetNZ welcomes enquiry from anyone interested in undertaking ENUM development work and participating in the Trial. "One Number To Hold Them All" Michael Sutton Chairman - InternetNZ ENUM Task Force Councillor InternetNZ Member Technical and Audit Committee Phone: +64 4 4721600 Ext 730 mailto:michael.sutton(a)internetnz.net.nz
For those intereted, trademe has been running a survey of ISPs and a test of performance. http://www.trademe.co.nz/structure/community/survey_results.asp The results are interesting - paradise comes out fastest in dialup and 2 Mbit customers, but only third in 256 kbit customers. DSL and Dialup account for ~40% of customers each, with wireless/cable/corporate taking the last 20%. The subjective questions of perceived reliability, customer support and value for money have little correlation to the speeds, which is interesting. Inspire Net comes out best in two out of three and second in the other category. Any comments on the speed differences for 256 kbit customers?
criggie(a)criggie.dyndns.org wrote: <snip>
Any comments on the speed differences for 256 kbit customers?
I think TM made a mistake by differentiating TelstraClear and Paradise in the results. Paradise Cable customers are all 2MB/s except those on grandfathered plans (maybe even those?) Cable latency is minimal, servers are local, and they've got a TC interconnect now I believe. Paradise/TC ADSL users would be largely/totally 256KB/s? /Bruce
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 18:13 +1200, criggie(a)criggie.dyndns.org wrote:
For those intereted, trademe has been running a survey of ISPs and a test of performance.
http://www.trademe.co.nz/structure/community/survey_results.asp
Any comments on the speed differences for 256 kbit customers?
Well, without seeing the test methodology, it's hard to say. But if I assume that the server that the punters tested against was located close to TM's citylink connection, then it's an interesting observation on the effects of the telcos and ISP's electing to peer (or not) with citylink as the case may be. Meh, but then again it could be just a reflection on the kind of people who would do a survey, be interested in how they connect to the net and be a trademe member. what interests me is how they defined a 'corporate' connection - which is a somewhat different classification to the tech based one in the same section. And I'd be assuming that broadminded corporate connections would be exceeding 2Mbps. psst. wanna buy my old washing machine? jamie
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:20, Jamie Baddeley wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 18:13 +1200, criggie(a)criggie.dyndns.org wrote:
For those intereted, trademe has been running a survey of ISPs and a test of performance.
http://www.trademe.co.nz/structure/community/survey_results.asp
Any comments on the speed differences for 256 kbit customers?
Well, without seeing the test methodology, it's hard to say.
But if I assume that the server that the punters tested against was located close to TM's citylink connection, then it's an interesting observation on the effects of the telcos and ISP's electing to peer (or not) with citylink as the case may be.
Meh, but then again it could be just a reflection on the kind of people who would do a survey, be interested in how they connect to the net and be a trademe member.
what interests me is how they defined a 'corporate' connection - which is a somewhat different classification to the tech based one in the same section. And I'd be assuming that broadminded corporate connections would be exceeding 2Mbps.
psst. wanna buy my old washing machine?
Most of the survey was a form filled in, so if you clicked modem or dsl and were on the other etc . Not everyone knows what kind of account they have, i could easily see somebody who has an adsl modem thinking it was a 'dialup connection' because they had a modem or similar. Liz
jamie
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
-- I don't work here. I'm a consultant.
participants (5)
-
Bruce Fitzsimons
-
criggieï¼ criggie.dyndns.org
-
Jamie Baddeley
-
Liz
-
Michael Sutton