Re: [nznog] Technical Announcement
At 10:14 PM 6/29/2005 +1200, Simon Lyall wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Jamie Baddeley wrote:
Have you considered multicast as an option, and if so, what stopped you from deploying it? Client support or Network support?
Does anyone have full end to end support of multicast? I would guess with bitstream and people having layer-2 all the way it might be possible to do it these days.
In a pure L2 network multicast is a dangerous technology. Think of what happens to a 10meg user when a 100meg user kicks off a 25meg multicast stream. The trend seems to be to use multicast inside tunnels in this environment. Thats the way the Access Grid folks are going. It also allows user groups within a network to opt in and out of multicast sessions. Theres quite a few tunnels tools around.
Not sure what it would be any practical use for though. Lots of chickens and eggs here.
yes. A few "broken network" days ahead. Multicast is good for synchronous events - like TV watching or LOTR Premieres etc. But for asynchronous events - like day to day watching of video, which is tending towards "on-demand", then multicast has almost no value. With the usual availability of bandwidth, I feel multicast is going to be of declining importance but will be implemented more for niche applications, which will become more important in themselves. The "tv" world is fascinated by "video on demand" and the radio (Audio) world is fascinated by Podcasting (aka on-demand listening - mobile). Neither of these is aided by multicast and in themselves they don't impose huge demands on both servers and networks. What we do know is 50x 2meg streams doesn't require 100Mbps. The technology certainly doesn't work that way - the playout buffer is your friend. So unicast streams are not overly heavy on the network or the server. Having said all that, we will be playing with multicast and probably making it available. The other thing we'll be playing with is better quality and alternate compressions. We're very close to be able to originate those nice HD streams we demo'd last year. So maybe NZNOG-06 will be in 10Mbps HD streams....... Rich
Richard Naylor wrote:
At 10:14 PM 6/29/2005 +1200, Simon Lyall wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Jamie Baddeley wrote:
Have you considered multicast as an option, and if so, what stopped you from deploying it? Client support or Network support?
Does anyone have full end to end support of multicast? I would guess with bitstream and people having layer-2 all the way it might be possible to do it these days.
In a pure L2 network multicast is a dangerous technology. Think of what happens to a 10meg user when a 100meg user kicks off a 25meg multicast stream.
Not that I'm up to date with Multicast, but isn't that what PIM-Sparse is for? Oh, you said pure L2 network... I suppose that makes it harder. But who doesn't want routers everywhere? ;) Stephen. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephen Donnelly BCMS PhD email: sfd(a)endace.com Endace Technology Ltd phone: +64 7 839 0540 Hamilton, New Zealand cell: +64 21 1104378 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Richard Naylor
-
Stephen Donnelly