Isn't it strange that one of the single biggest topics for discussion on this list over the last few months has been a bunch of people with little or no legal background debating points of law. Anyone up for forming a new list 'nzbrl' - see http://www.thefreedictionary.com/barrack-room+lawyer
Andy, On 2011-09-05 16:53, Andy Linton wrote:
Isn't it strange that one of the single biggest topics for discussion on this list over the last few months has been a bunch of people with little or no legal background debating points of law.
No, for anyone who has inhabited the main IETF discussion list for more than a few weeks, this is not strange at all. I suspect the same is true for the NANOG list, but I mainly avoid that one because of its signal/noise ratio. But isn't the impact of a new law on operations a valid topic anyway? I think the S/N ratio on this list is pretty good actually, but since this is N, I will shut up immediately. Brian
participants (2)
-
Andy Linton
-
Brian E Carpenter