RE: [nznog] Legal log retention requirements?
-----Original Message----- From: nznog-bounces+Donald.Neal=telecom.co.nz(a)list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces+Donald.Neal=telecom.co.nz(a)list.waikato.a c.nz] On Behalf Of Joe Abley Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2004 9:23 a.m. To: James Riden Cc: NZ Network Operators Group Subject: Re: [nznog] Legal log retention requirements? [...] The truly paranoid also won't use syslog :-)
Has anybody seen an implementation of RFC3195 in the wild, by the way?
http://security.sdsc.edu/software/sdsc-syslog/ ? - Donald Neal Donald Neal | "I suspect most samba Technical Specialist | developers are already Operations Engineering | technically insane. Of course, Integration & Services Divn. | since many of them are Alcatel NZ Ltd | Australians you can't tell." All opinions mine only. | - Linus Torvalds ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 09:33:55AM +1200, Donald Neal wrote:
The truly paranoid also won't use syslog :-)
Has anybody seen an implementation of RFC3195 in the wild, by the way?
http://security.sdsc.edu/software/sdsc-syslog/ ?
- Donald Neal
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch9.en.html Section 9.5 touches on some of the extra things that could be done aswell, for those who are that way inclined. Cheers, James.
participants (2)
-
Donald Neal
-
jamesc@wave.co.nz