WebFarm blames Ihug for its network becoming inaccessible, because of action Ihug took >following a network attack. But Ihug director Nick Wood doesn't believe the 16-hour outage was >its fault. He says Ihug was being attacked by someone he claims was on the WebFarm network. "We >blocked their network on our router and Waikato's router, for some reason, at NZIX learned the >route."
IHUG doesn't directly connect to NZIX. They are behind Telecom's router. -----Original Message----- From: Joe Abley [mailto:jabley(a)patho.gen.nz] Sent: Monday, 8 February 1999 01:15 To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: BGP at NZIX. Mmm. http://www.idg.co.nz/nzweb/ca6a.html Looks like another good reason to use a routing protocol that can be filtered at NZIX :) Joe --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 09:21:15AM +1300, Warwick GLENDENNING wrote:
WebFarm blames Ihug for its network becoming inaccessible, because of action Ihug took >following a network attack. But Ihug director Nick Wood doesn't believe the 16-hour outage was >its fault. He says Ihug was being attacked by someone he claims was on the WebFarm network. "We >blocked their network on our router and Waikato's router, for some reason, at NZIX learned the >route."
IHUG doesn't directly connect to NZIX. They are behind Telecom's router.
So being able to filter Telecom's advertisement would be a good thing? Does anybody know - was the route in question _really_ redistributed by Telecom across NZIX? Or is this just idg "accuracy"? Joe --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
participants (2)
-
Joe Abley -
Warwick GLENDENNING