Nathan Ward wrote on 16 April 2003:
In that case RFC1918 space can be used... else beware the whining gamer who can't play CounterStrike with a v6 address.
Please let us not head down the path of handing out RFC1918 space to end users as if this is a real connection. That way leads to Much Pain with Less Than Friendly Protocols. Which seems to be an awful lot beyond CS weenies :) The day an ISP hands me an address which is RFC1918 is the day I switch away. -- David Zanetti <david.zanetti(a)nzpost.co.nz> Desk: +64-4-496-4005 Mobile: +64-25-832-572 "Hope.. is a dangerous thing" This email with any attachments is confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If it is not intended for you please reply immediately, destroy it and do not copy, disclose or use it in any way.
I was not suggesting it as an option, it was meerly to point out that giving a v6 address in place of a v4 address is just as bad, if not worse. Nathan Ward Zanetti David wrote:
Nathan Ward wrote on 16 April 2003:
In that case RFC1918 space can be used... else beware the whining gamer who can't play CounterStrike with a v6 address.
Please let us not head down the path of handing out RFC1918 space to end users as if this is a real connection. That way leads to Much Pain with Less Than Friendly Protocols. Which seems to be an awful lot beyond CS weenies :)
The day an ISP hands me an address which is RFC1918 is the day I switch away.
On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 11:56, Zanetti David wrote:
Please let us not head down the path of handing out RFC1918 space to end users as if this is a real connection. That way leads to Much Pain with Less Than Friendly Protocols. Which seems to be an awful lot beyond CS weenies :)
36878 players and 3132 clans ranked on 3 servers in 7 days. I wouldnt exactly say 36 thousand paying customers are 'weenies'
participants (3)
-
Jeremy Brooking -
Nathan Ward -
Zanetti David