Xen for network services (aka web/mail/dns etc) - OT?
Hi There, I have been discussing the utilisation of Xen in a production environment on a couple of other lists (nzlug, debian-isp etc), but wondering if anyone from this list is using it in new zealand for serving of network services? Please let me know if this is OT. Would like to hear your experiences if so. Simon
Simon wrote:
Hi There,
I have been discussing the utilisation of Xen in a production environment on a couple of other lists (nzlug, debian-isp etc), but wondering if anyone from this list is using it in new zealand for serving of network services? Please let me know if this is OT.
Would like to hear your experiences if so.
Simon
I've deployed a Xen machine together with linux vservers inside the virtual Xen domains (don't ask) Running exim4/apache/samba/ldap and maybe some other things. Has been in production for several months now without any issues. -Richard
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:55:23PM +1300, Richard Patterson wrote:
Simon wrote:
Hi There,
I have been discussing the utilisation of Xen in a production environment on a couple of other lists (nzlug, debian-isp etc), but wondering if anyone from this list is using it in new zealand for serving of network services? Please let me know if this is OT.
Would like to hear your experiences if so.
Simon
I've deployed a Xen machine together with linux vservers inside the virtual Xen domains (don't ask)
Running exim4/apache/samba/ldap and maybe some other things. Has been in production for several months now without any issues.
Can I ask why you would choose this over using something like FreeBSD jails which provide seperation with no overhead? Andrew
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:55:23PM +1300, Richard Patterson wrote:
I've deployed a Xen machine together with linux vservers inside the virtual Xen domains (don't ask)
Running exim4/apache/samba/ldap and maybe some other things. Has been in production for several months now without any issues.
Can I ask why you would choose this over using something like FreeBSD jails which provide seperation with no overhead?
Andrew
Customer wanted Xen -Richard
$quoted_author = "Andrew Thompson" ;
Can I ask why you would choose this over using something like FreeBSD jails which provide seperation with no overhead?
raw IP sockets for one... cheers marty -- <shortigo> I can't find my enlightenment configuration files <BedMan> look in ~/.enlightenment <shortigo> I don't seem to have one <hazard> 'the path to enlightment is hard to find' http://www.bash.org/?238734
Hi, We're using it extensively. We're offering it as a product to customers, running DNS, qmail, apache, and a number of custom apps on it. The stable releases are rock solidly reliable, and the development efforts behind it are giving it new features all the time. At the moment with stable releases you're limited to running a domain on a single CPU, which is a bit of a pain, but the next release is going to include virtual processors, so multiple "real" processors can be sent instructions from one master virtual processor to which domains are assigned. Cheers, Erin Salmon Managing Director Unleash Computers Ltd Unleash Networks Ltd Mobile: 021 877 913 Landline: 03 365 1273 -----Original Message----- From: Simon [mailto:greminn(a)gmail.com] Sent: 30 November 2005 4:57 p.m. To: NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: [nznog] Xen for network services (aka web/mail/dns etc) - OT? Hi There, I have been discussing the utilisation of Xen in a production environment on a couple of other lists (nzlug, debian-isp etc), but wondering if anyone from this list is using it in new zealand for serving of network services? Please let me know if this is OT. Would like to hear your experiences if so. Simon _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
On 11/30/05, Simon
I have been discussing the utilisation of Xen in a production environment on a couple of other lists (nzlug, debian-isp etc), but
I've been using it for pretty much everything. Even running an ubuntu NX desktop. Xen 2.0 is pretty solid, 3.0 is getting that way. In fact I'd say it was better running Xen than on the bare metal. Easy to restart a server if some strange happens, easy to move OS images around to new servers, easy to partition services into seperate sandboxes. -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C
participants (6)
-
Andrew Thompson
-
Erin Salmon - Unleash Computers Ltd
-
marty@supine.com
-
Nicholas Lee
-
Richard Patterson
-
Simon