More ‘public park’ broadband wireless spectrum released
source from RSM update... More 'public park' broadband wireless spectrum released Further radio spectrum for broadband wireless access has been made available with changes made to the Radiocommunications (General User Radio Licence for Short Range Devices) Notice. The government has opened the 5.47 – 5.725 GHz and 57 - 64 GHz radio frequency bands as 'public park' spectrum for broadband wireless services suitable for expanding wireless local area networks (Wi-Fi) and to extend the reach of existing fibre optic networks. Access to 'public park' spectrum does not attract a licence fee. Previously licensed users in the bands should be able to continue to operate without being unduly impacted. The General User Radio Licence contains conditions to ensure that broadband wireless equipment operating in the 5.47 – 5.725 GHz band does not cause interference to existing radar operations that share this band. Access to the 5.47 – 5.725 GHz band augments access to the 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz bands and more than doubles the spectrum that is now exclusively available for wireless local area networks. The General User Radio Licence also contains conditions to ensure that broadband wireless access equipment operating in the 57 – 64 GHz band minimises interference, and maximises reliability and utility within the band. Access to this spectrum may be used to provide short-range (~1 Km) high capacity (1 Gbit/sec) point-to-point links used to extend the reach of fibre-optic cabling, and/or to provide high speed short range backhaul for telecommunications network infrastructure.
On 4/5/07, Dan Clark
The government has opened the 5.47 – 5.725 GHz and 57 - 64 GHz radio frequency bands as 'public park' spectrum for broadband wireless services suitable for expanding wireless local area networks (Wi-Fi) and to extend the reach of existing fibre optic networks. Access to 'public park' spectrum does not attract a licence fee. Previously licensed users in the bands should be able to continue to operate without being unduly impacted.
The General User Radio Licence contains conditions to ensure that broadband wireless equipment operating in the 5.47 – 5.725 GHz band does not cause interference to existing radar operations that share this band. Access to the 5.47 – 5.725 GHz band augments access to the 2.4 GHz and 5.8GHz bands and more than doubles the spectrum that is now exclusively available for wireless local area networks.
The full details have been amended to the GURL page at the RSM website: http://www.rsm.govt.nz/licensing/gurls/gurl-srd.html : * *Note 6:In the band 5470-5725 MHz the maximum transmitter power is 250 mW with a maximum permitted mean power of 1 watt e.i.r.p. and a maximum permitted mean power density of 50 mW/MHz e.i.r.p., provided Dynamic Frequency Selection and Transmitter Power Control are implemented. If transmitter power control is not in use, then the maximum permitted mean power shall be reduced by 3 dB. This is great news for all our WISPs wanting to deploy more low power micro-pops around the place and avoid stomping on their own existing 5.3/5.8Ghz channels. As 5.4Ghz has just been given the go ahead by the FCC in the US, there will be FCC compliant equipment becoming available very soon! Hopefully the new generation of equipment will allow our WISPs to keep leap-frogging ADSL in delivering faster, better broadband out to the masses :) Cheers, Blair
1W is good for 3 or 4km in perfect conditions, I'm guessing most WISPs need to cover larger areas than this. The max output power at 5.8Ghz also appears to have been reduced - it is now max. 4W (good for about 5 or 6km). So presumably much of the gear WISPs have been using won't be allowed anymore e.g. Trango's with dishes, etc. This might be good news for WISPs operating small metro networks, but it is bad news for anyone covering large rural areas. Basically, operating a reasonable size WISP has just got a lot more expensive. Cheers, Paul On 5 Apr 2007 at 17:13, Blair Harrison wrote:
On 4/5/07, Dan Clark
wrote: The government has opened the 5.47 - 5.725 GHz and 57 - 64 GHz radio frequency bands as 'public park' spectrum for broadband wireless services suitable for expanding wireless local area networks (Wi-Fi) and to extend the reach of existing fibre optic networks. Access to 'public park' spectrum does not attract a licence fee. Previously licensed users in the bands should be able to continue to operate without being unduly impacted.
The General User Radio Licence contains conditions to ensure that broadband wireless equipment operating in the 5.47 - 5.725 GHz band does not cause interference to existing radar operations that share this band. Access to the 5.47 - 5.725 GHz band augments access to the 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz bands and more than doubles the spectrum that is now exclusively available for wireless local area networks.
The full details have been amended to the GURL page at the RSM website:
http://www.rsm.govt.nz/licensing/gurls/gurl-srd.html :
Note 6:In the band 5470-5725 MHz the maximum transmitter power is 250 mW with a maximum permitted mean power of 1 watt e.i.r.p. and a maximum permitted mean power density of 50 mW/MHz e.i.r.p., provided Dynamic Frequency Selection and Transmitter Power Control are implemented. If transmitter power control is not in use, then the maximum permitted mean power shall be reduced by 3 dB.
This is great news for all our WISPs wanting to deploy more low power micro-pops around the place and avoid stomping on their own existing 5.3/5.8Ghz channels. As 5.4Ghz has just been given the go ahead by the FCC in the US, there will be FCC compliant equipment becoming available very soon!
Hopefully the new generation of equipment will allow our WISPs to keep leap-frogging ADSL in delivering faster, better broadband out to the masses :)
Cheers, Blair
NetSmart Ltd http://www.netsmart.co.nz/, Level 2, Regency House, 1 Elizabeth Street, P O Box 15020, Tauranga, New Zealand Tel: 07 5711367 Fax: 07 5711372
On 4/5/07, Paul Horak
1W is good for 3 or 4km in perfect conditions, I'm guessing most WISPs need to cover larger areas than this. The max output power at 5.8Ghz also appears to have been reduced - it is now max. 4W (good for about 5 or 6km). So presumably much of the gear WISPs have been using won't be allowed anymore e.g. Trango's with dishes, etc. This might be good news for WISPs operating small metro networks, but it is bad news for anyone covering large rural areas. Basically, operating a reasonable size WISP has just got a lot more expensive.
Cheers,
Paul
No, the 4W/200W PTP maximum power hasn't changed as far as I'm aware. http://www.rsm.govt.nz/licensing/frl/information.html still shows 4W and 200W max on 5.8Ghz. 5.4Ghz not on that page yet it seems. The whole point of opening 5.4Ghz is for lower power short range communications, in crowded metro centres where currently there is a lot of contention for 2.4Ghz and 5.8Ghz spectrum. More mini POPs, covering shorter distances. This is not going to help in the instances of needing to cover 6-10KM and further ranges, for which 5.8Ghz/2.4Ghz is still much more suited. Cheers, Blair
That's not how I understand it, the new GURL notice stats that: * The Radiocommunications Regulations (General User Radio Licence for Short Range Devices) Notice 2004 dated 6th day of December 2004 and published in the New Zealand Gazette, 9 December 2004, No. 160, page 3976, is revoked. * Notwithstanding the revocation of a notice under subsection (1), every transmitter compliant with the requirements of that notice on the commencement date of this notice is deemed to be compliant with the requirements of this notice. I think this was the notice that allowed higher output power at 5Ghz. So I'm pretty sure it means that existing high powered 5Ghz links can stay, but no new ones are allowed - max. output power is now 4W at 5Ghz. Cheers, Paul On 6 Apr 2007 at 1:09, Blair Harrison wrote:
On 4/5/07, Paul Horak
wrote: 1W is good for 3 or 4km in perfect conditions, I'm guessing most WISPs need to cover larger areas than this. The max output power at 5.8Ghz also appears to have been reduced - it is now max. 4W (good for about 5 or 6km). So presumably much of the gear WISPs have been using won't be allowed anymore e.g. Trango's with dishes, etc. This might be good news for WISPs operating small metro networks, but it is bad news for anyone covering large rural areas. Basically, operating a reasonable size WISP has just got a lot more expensive. Cheers,
Paul
No, the 4W/200W PTP maximum power hasn't changed as far as I'm aware.
http://www.rsm.govt.nz/licensing/frl/information.html still shows 4W and 200W max on 5.8Ghz. 5.4Ghz not on that page yet it seems.
The whole point of opening 5.4Ghz is for lower power short range communications, in crowded metro centres where currently there is a lot of contention for 2.4Ghz and 5.8Ghz spectrum. More mini POPs, covering shorter distances. This is not going to help in the instances of needing to cover 6-10KM and further ranges, for which 5.8Ghz/2.4Ghz is still much more suited.
Cheers, Blair
NetSmart Ltd http://www.netsmart.co.nz/, Level 2, Regency House, 1 Elizabeth Street, P O Box 15020, Tauranga, New Zealand Tel: 07 5711367 Fax: 07 5711372
You will find that the MED separated the GURL point to multipoint and FIXED. The 5.8Ghz @ 200Watts EiRP is still covered under the GURL -Fixed as per June 2004 as seen here http://www.rsm.govt.nz/licensing/gurls/gurl-fixed.html Also good to have the 57 - 64 GHz band opened up so we can get some more 1.25GigBps FD links in service and hopefully soon to be followed by a definition of use for the 80GHz spectrum as well.. New Spectrum = new link capacity and options. But then I am biased on both counts. Regards Ian Hastie LINKIT Ph +64 (0)21 75-5465 Fx +64 (0)4 905-5465 Skype: ian_hastie_mob PO Box 1661 Paraparaumu NEW ZEALAND www.linkit.co.nz Flexible Access Networks Disclaimer: The information in this email (including attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this email, please notify the author by replying to this email and destroy the message. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful -----Original Message----- From: Paul Horak [mailto:paul(a)netsmart.co.nz] Sent: Friday, 6 April 2007 1:14 p.m. To: Blair Harrison Cc: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: Re: [nznog]More 'public park' broadband wireless spectrum released That's not how I understand it, the new GURL notice stats that: * The Radiocommunications Regulations (General User Radio Licence for Short Range Devices) Notice 2004 dated 6th day of December 2004 and published in the New Zealand Gazette, 9 December 2004, No. 160, page 3976, is revoked. * Notwithstanding the revocation of a notice under subsection (1), every transmitter compliant with the requirements of that notice on the commencement date of this notice is deemed to be compliant with the requirements of this notice. I think this was the notice that allowed higher output power at 5Ghz. So I'm pretty sure it means that existing high powered 5Ghz links can stay, but no new ones are allowed - max. output power is now 4W at 5Ghz. Cheers, Paul On 6 Apr 2007 at 1:09, Blair Harrison wrote:
On 4/5/07, Paul Horak
wrote: 1W is good for 3 or 4km in perfect conditions, I'm guessing most WISPs need to cover larger areas than this. The max output power at 5.8Ghz
also
appears to have been reduced - it is now max. 4W (good for about 5 or 6km). So presumably much of the gear WISPs have been using won't be allowed anymore e.g. Trango's with dishes, etc. This might be good
news
for WISPs operating small metro networks, but it is bad news for
anyone
covering large rural areas. Basically, operating a reasonable size
WISP has
just got a lot more expensive.
Cheers,
Paul
No, the 4W/200W PTP maximum power hasn't changed as far as I'm aware.
http://www.rsm.govt.nz/licensing/frl/information.html still shows 4W and
200W max on 5.8Ghz.
5.4Ghz not on that page yet it seems.
The whole point of opening 5.4Ghz is for lower power short range communications, in crowded metro centres where currently there is a lot of contention for 2.4Ghz and 5.8Ghz spectrum. More mini POPs, covering shorter distances. This is not going to help in the instances of needing to cover 6-10KM and further ranges, for which 5.8Ghz/2.4Ghz is still much more suited.
Cheers, Blair
NetSmart Ltd http://www.netsmart.co.nz/, Level 2, Regency House, 1 Elizabeth Street, P O Box 15020, Tauranga, New Zealand Tel: 07 5711367 Fax: 07 5711372 _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
participants (4)
-
Blair Harrison
-
Dan Clark
-
Ian Hastie
-
Paul Horak