It was just a suggestion, that email was a few days old and none of you guys had responded (obviously cos it was sorted) - I was just trying to help.

...

All your comments are just rumour and speculation.

Yeah, absolutely I don't _know_ anything and I said that. Again just a suggestion. _b -----Original Message----- From: Simon Allard [mailto:simona(a)staff.iinet.net.au] Sent: Wednesday, 22 June 2005 9:23 a.m. To: Blair Robson; nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: RE: [nznog] Anyone awake at Ihug NOC/Security? Blair. Please don't comment on ihug matters which you know nothing about. All your comments are just rumour and speculation. None of the senior type jobs have gone. Yes some have left for other jobs, but they have all been replaced with new staff. abuse(a)iinet.net.au has no visibility into the ihug NZ network, so they will be no help to you. abuse(a)ihug.co.nz is the correct email to use. For the record, Mark was contacted minutes after his email and his problem was sorted. Cheers Simon Allard IHUG Security Monkey

-----Original Message----- From: Blair Robson [mailto:blair.robson(a)ihug.co.nz] Sent: Wednesday, 22 June 2005 2:52 a.m. To: jon.brewer(a)att.net; 'Mark Foster'; nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: RE: [nznog] Anyone awake at Ihug NOC/Security?

Seriously - try abuse(a)iinet.net.au , explain that you have tried contacting abuse(a)ihug.co.nz (I assume you have?) I don't know weather that will work or not, but I do know that nearly all the senior people at Ihug in NZ are gone..And I think you will find Simon no longer works for Ihug. As far as I can gather everything is being run or in the process of being run from Perth now.

Blair

-----Original Message----- From: jon.brewer(a)att.net [mailto:jon.brewer(a)att.net] Sent: Tuesday, 21 June 2005 3:25 p.m. To: Blair Robson; 'Mark Foster'; nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: RE: [nznog] Anyone awake at Ihug NOC/Security?

We too need a reply from Ihug security, and have unanswered mail in to noc(a)ihug.net - address from Simon Lyall's NOC Contact List. Is there a better address?

To air some dirty laundry, 203-173-155-220.bliink.ihug.co.nz has generated 30 GB of http traffic in the past month for one of our customers - repeatedly downloading one file. (2400 times at last count) Our customer would rather like it to stop.

JB

-------------- Original message from "Blair Robson" : --------------

...

abuse(a)iinet ?

-----Original Message----- From: Mark Foster [mailto:blakjak(a)blakjak.net] Sent: Wednesday, 15 June 2005 5:05 p.m. To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: [nznog] Anyone awake at Ihug NOC/Security?

Repeat emails over the last week or two to abuse@ and noc@ havn't had any sort of response or acknowledgement - can someone from Ihug NOC or security please contact me offlist.

Thanks Mark.

_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog