Re: [nznog] THE SKY IS FALLING ( was Re: IPv4 Exhaustion)
--- richardn(a)cs.waikato.ac.nz wrote:----------------------
From: Richard Nelson
This was discussed earlier in the recent flurry of email on the subject. Also, this is why I was asking about VPRNs. However, I missed the part on why STBs need unique IPs or why they need 2 per box.
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/real/100million.ram the answer to the second question is about a minute in.
I don't have any experience managing a network of 50 million end devices to be able to answer the 1st question exactly, but apparently that is how Comcast designed their management and provisioning systems and also apparently the pain of IPv6 migration is less than the pain of changing those systems and/or the pain of operating them with out "global" visibility of the network. Richard. Matthew Luckie wrote:
This was discussed earlier in the recent flurry of email on the subject. Also, this is why I was asking about VPRNs. However, I missed the part on why STBs need unique IPs or why they need 2 per box.
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/real/100million.ram
the answer to the second question is about a minute in.
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
participants (3)
-
Matthew Luckie
-
Richard Nelson
-
Scott Weeks