On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 14:53, Craig Whitmore wrote:
Those days you could register es.co.nz (you can't now if this was not tak> en) (but they made rules up than you can't register domains as the 3rd level being the same as the 1st level domain) (Anyone know the reason for this? (there must be a good reason)) (I want to register nz.co.nz and us.co.nz)
Your out of luck, us.co.nz and nz.co.nz are taken... I _think_ that the restriction may have been lifted but I'm not 100% sure.
The restriction was lifted by InternetNZ late last year. Don Stokes can explain far better than me why there used to be a ban on TLDs being registered at the 3rd level but basically it used to cause problems for some old servers. Data indicated that the number of people likely to still be using such old software is very limited and that as most other TLDs allowed TLD names at the third level we should follow the trend. Incidentially ICANN is moving to ban ccTLD (and country) names at the 2nd level in gTLDs because some Govts have asked for this. But that is for political not technical reasons DPF - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
At 3:13 AM +0000 4/4/02, David Farrar wrote:
Incidentially ICANN is moving to ban ccTLD (and country) names at the 2nd level in gTLDs because some Govts have asked for this. But that is for political not technical reasons
So much for ICANN being a "technical co-ordination body". ICANN wrote a blanket ban on 1 & 2 char .info names into the registry's contract. At one stage a few months back the .info registry mistakenly deleted the blocking code in the registration system and word got around fast. All 2 char .infos had been registered within a few hours. Most I think via Dotster who did not have 2 char blocking checks in their pre-registration code. Later, when the error was discover, the registry deleted all the registrations and Dotster refunded. -- Andrew P. Gardner barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP? We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare? Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
David Farrar
The restriction was lifted by InternetNZ late last year. Don Stokes can explain far better than me why there used to be a ban on TLDs being registered at the 3rd level but basically it used to cause problems for some old servers.
Of the many times I've explained this one, I think this is the most
appropriate:
At 5:00 PM +1200 4/4/02, Don Stokes wrote:
David Farrar
wrote: The restriction was lifted by InternetNZ late last year. Don Stokes can explain far better than me why there used to be a ban on TLDs being registered at the 3rd level but basically it used to cause problems for some old servers.
Of the many times I've explained this one, I think this is the most appropriate:
[snip. Cogent explanation deleted] And dating back even further, at VUW we had a policy that no HOST part could be a TLD. W a a y back, there were domain-endian wars. JANET used mailbox(a)uk.co.host and the US (not yet the Internet) used mailbox(a)host.EDU. So, faced with mailbox(a)uk.co.es, was that JANET: host 'es' in the 'co' 2LD of the 'uk' TLD, or TCP: host 'uk' in the 'co' 2LD of the 'es' TLD? Since we had both SPEARNET (JANET style) and TCP/IP for a while, we enforced the host name restriction (actually, I think it was no hosts called COM/EDU/ORG/NET/MIL or any 2 letter host name). -- Michael Newbery Technical Specialist TelstraClear Limited - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
participants (4)
-
Andy Gardner
-
David Farrar
-
Don Stokes
-
Michael Newbery