net 10 has flipped before, as has 192.0.0.0, and there remains flareups surrounding the 224.0.0.0 block. I'm not holding my breath. (pragmatically, the OSI protocols had a much larger installed base than IPv6 - at the same point in their lifecycles - It (OSI) didn't survive and given the rate of IPv6 adoption - 15 years on, I remain dubious) YMMV of course and yes, I am IPv6 enabled - have been for more than a decade. Its lonlier than G+. /bill On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:43:02AM -0700, Scott Weeks wrote:

--- bmanning(a)vacation.karoshi.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:21:11AM -0700, Scott Weeks wrote:

...

As a side note for admins that use the bogon list, for IPv4 you might as well go to the end state:

: End state? Heard that a couple of times before... ------------------------------------------------------------

I'm not following. Do you mean you think they'll allocate IPv4 from these to the RIRs?

...

0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 169.254.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.16.0.0 255.240.0.0 192.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.0.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 198.18.0.0 255.254.0.0 198.51.100.0 255.255.255.0 203.0.113.0 255.255.255.0 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0

scott

_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog