Joe Abley wrote:-
Netgate is an operating name for a service of Telecom NZ. I don't think there is any doubt that if anybody owns Netgate, Telecom NZ does :)
Providers who connect to Netgate will know that its a Telecom NZ owned service. They get these regular peices of paper from them demanding money :-) However, most other folk may not know. Netgate, NZGATE, NZIX are words which get thrown around and I can see there is general confusion about what they mean.
Portability of addresses in general is a different issue (and one that is rather clear-cut for new address allocations); however, it would certainly benefit from wider exposure at the face-to-face as there is still much confusion in the user community on this issue.
There are more than a few people who believe they "own" address space, and that they have a right to have it routed to whereever they live. And then there are others who think they should be able to own address space so they can move between upstream providers without having to renumber. Can of worms people :-)
Notice I said "can" and not "should" :)
I think we should always apsire to do what "should be done" rather than whats possible. It helps stretch our minds a little :-) regards Peter Mott Chief Enthusiast 2Day Internet Limited http://www.2day.net.nz -/-
--------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
On Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 08:08:23AM +1300, 2Day Chief Enthusiast wrote:
Joe Abley wrote:-
Netgate is an operating name for a service of Telecom NZ. I don't think there is any doubt that if anybody owns Netgate, Telecom NZ does :)
Providers who connect to Netgate will know that its a Telecom NZ owned service. They get these regular peices of paper from them demanding money :-)
However, most other folk may not know. Netgate, NZGATE, NZIX are words which get thrown around and I can see there is general confusion about what they mean.
I take your point; however, I was under the impression that this agenda item was concerned with the NZGATE issues rather than as an introduction to tier-1 service providers in New Zealand :)
Notice I said "can" and not "should" :)
I think we should always apsire to do what "should be done" rather than whats possible. It helps stretch our minds a little :-)
My point was rather that I am wary of ISOCNZ being a body suitable to
dictate what _should_ be done on this issue. Its members are more than
qualified to discuss what _can_ be done, however.
--
Joe Abley
participants (2)
-
2Day Chief Enthusiast
-
Joe Abley