Looks fine to me. I appreciated the heads up. In the scheme of things it's a lot more informative than the NZRR updates used to be. IMO, If it becomes a problem worry about it then. Dean On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:

Cheers Alex, I have to ask the question tho Is this 'on-topic' ? If I were posting vendor bugs which could be potentially problematic, this would be a very high traffic list indeed.

I have to agree, a friendly heads up for a bug on commonly used Vendor equipment that could affect the NZ network community is well worth the few bytes of traffic on my email server. Tony Wicks | Solarix Networks Limited DDI: | Mob: | Office: +64 9 974 4750 | FAX: +64 9 974 4760 Email: tony.wicks(a)solarix.co.nz | Web: www.solarix.net.nz CAUTION: This email is confidential. If it is not intended for you please do not read, distribute or copy it or any attachments. Please notify the sender by return email and delete the original message and any attachments.Any views expressed in this email may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Solarix Networks Limited. Please consider the environment before printing this email! Disclaimer added by CodeTwo Exchange Rules http://www.codetwo.com -----Original Message----- From: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Dean Pemberton Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012 7:02 p.m. To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: Re: [nznog] Cisco ISC v 6.2 Looks fine to me. I appreciated the heads up. In the scheme of things it's a lot more informative than the NZRR updates used to be. IMO, If it becomes a problem worry about it then. Dean On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:

Cheers Alex, I have to ask the question tho Is this 'on-topic' ? If I were posting vendor bugs which could be potentially problematic, this would be a very high traffic list indeed.