- NZNOG - lists.nznog.org

Call for Papers - APRICOT 2015
by Dean Pemberton 02 Nov '14

02 Nov '14

Asia Pacific Regional Internet Conference on Operational Technologies (APRICOT) 24th February - 6th March 2015, Fukuoka, Japan https://2015.apricot.net CALL FOR PAPERS =============== The APRICOT 2015 Programme Committee is now seeking contributions for Presentations and Tutorials for APRICOT 2015. We are looking for presenters who would: - Offer a technical tutorial on an appropriate topic; - Participate in the technical conference sessions as a speaker; - Convene and chair panel sessions of relevant topics. Please submit on-line at: http://papers.apricot.net/user/login.php?event=19 CONFERENCE MILESTONES --------------------- Call for Papers Opens: 1 November 2014 First Draft Program Published: 6 December 2014 Final Deadline for Submissions: 7 February 2015 Final Program Published: 14 February 2015 Final Slides Received: 21 February 2015 PROGRAMME MATERIAL ------------------ The APRICOT Programme is organised in three parts, including workshops, tutorials and the conference. Topics for tutorials and the conference must be relevant to Internet Operations and Technologies: - IPv4 / IPv6 Routing and operations - IPv6 deployment and transition technologies - Internet backbone operations - ISP and Carrier services - IXPs and Peering - Research on Internet Operations and Deployment - Japan Internet - Software Defined Networking / Network Function Virtualisaton - Network security issues (NSP-SEC, DDoS, Anti-Spam, Anti-Malware) - DNS / DNSSEC - Internet policy (Security, Regulation, Content Management, Addressing, etc) - Access and Transport Technologies, including Cable/DSL, 3G/LTE, wireless, metro ethernet, fibre, MPLS - Content & Service Delivery (Multicast, Voice, Video, "telepresence", Gaming) and Cloud Computing CfP SUBMISSION -------------- Draft slides for both tutorials and conference sessions MUST be provided with CfP submissions otherwise the Programme Committee will be unable to review the submission. For work in progress, the most current information available at time of submission is acceptable. All draft and complete slides must be submitted in PDF format only. Final slides are to be provided by the specified deadline for publication on the APRICOT website. Prospective presenters should note that the majority of speaking slots will be filled well before the final submission deadline. The PC will retain a limited number of slots up to the final submission deadline for presentations that are exceptionally timely, important, or of critical operational importance. Please submit on-line at: http://papers.apricot.net/user/login.php?event=19 Any questions or concerns should be addressed to the Programme Committee by e-mail at: pc-chairs at apricot.net We look forward to receiving your presentation proposals. Mark Tinka, Raphael Ho & Dean Pemberton Co-Chairs, APRICOT Programme Committee

1 0

Cableways rack - offer me beer and it's yours (Auckland)
by David Robb 28 Oct '14

28 Oct '14

I have a surplus-to-requirements cableways rack available to a good home. It’s in Auckland (Blockhouse Bay), and you have to come and pick it up. https://paradise.gen.nz/stuff/rack.jpg If you want to give me money for it, that’d be great, if the best offer is someone who’ll just take it away, that’ll do. Thanks, David

1 0

Moving Phone Lines
by Skeeve Stevens 28 Oct '14

28 Oct '14

Hey all, I have a site in Albany NZ that is merging with a site in the city. They have multiple indials - could be ISDN, I am not sure... they also have multiple 0800's and another 0508 number. We aren't really sure how these are delivered and by who. Does anyone know how I could find this out? ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd skeeve(a)eintellegonetworks.co.nz ; www.eintellegonetworks.co.nz Phone: +612 8014 7398; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering

2 1

NZNOG Power Leads and Multiboards
by Mark Foster 28 Oct '14

28 Oct '14

Hi Folks I'm trying to track down the NZNOG pool of power leads and multiboards; i'm hoping to borrow these if possible. Queries to the NZNOG conference team don't seem to be going anywhere and i'm not sure who the organisers for this year are, to ping them personally. Does anyone know the wherabouts of these? Offlist responses perhaps most appropriate. Thanks Mark.

1 1

openvz vm's
by Tony Wicks 24 Oct '14

24 Oct '14

I've noticed openvz VM's on several different international hosing providers have all dropped out at once (currently down), anyone else seeing this ? cheers

3 3

Vodafone VSI / Spark SecureME
by Tom Henderson 22 Oct '14

22 Oct '14

Hi All I'm interested in some feedback (off list) from anyone using either Vodafone VSI or Spark's SecureME offerings. We're currently looking into both of these for a group of hospitality outlets. Cheers Tom Henderson IT Manager | Pack & Company | 027 461 4403 | 09 929 2750 | tom(a)pack.co.nz -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not disclose, copy, or distribute any information contained in or attached to it, or take any action/inaction based on it. Please contact us immediately, and delete this email from your system. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and not of Pack & Company (NZ) Limited (the "Company"), however any intellectual property contained in or attached to this email is the property of the Company. Thank you.

1 0

Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS)
by Dean Pemberton 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

The latest useful community service from Team Cymru ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: John Kristoff <jtk(a)cymru.com> [ Apologies if you have seen this elsewhere already - jtk ] Friends and colleagues, Last week I briefly discussed a new project we've recently launched and for which invited participation from the NANOG 62 attendees. This is a not so subtle wider request for consideration. UTRS is essentially a community RTBH that people have suggested to us would be a good service to provide, so we're giving it a go. The lightning talk page has the slide deck I presented: <https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=2436> I've also put some additional technical detail here: <http://www.cymru.com/jtk/misc/utrs.html> There was a brief discussion, mostly criticism and that is fine, that took place on the NANOG list you may wish to review. If you have an assigned ASN and this sounds like something you or your network would like to take advantage of, drop me a line, I'd sure like to hear about it. If you think this is a terrible idea and want to express all that is wrong with it, tell me that too, I can take it. Even if you're unsure if you would ultimately deploy it in production, but are interested in testing it, do contact me. We won't expend energy on this project and will drop it if we there isn't sufficient interest from the community, but enough trial users would be encouraging. Kindly, John

1 0

Facebook NOC
by Stan Rivett 14 Oct '14

14 Oct '14

Hi guys Has anyone had any luck communicating with Facebook network operations in the past? They appear to be filtering our shiny new /22 and it is making clients somewhat grumpy. Cheers Stan Rivett ------------------ Netspeed Data Ltd PO Box 5691 Dunedin P: +64 3 481 7245 C: +64 21 323 841 ------------------

1 0

Is there anyone on the list using mikrotik hardware to receive UFB Handovers from Chorus?
by Alexander Neilson 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

Hey Everyone We have just stood up our first Chorus UFB Handovers in Auckland and Wellington and while the Mikrotik’s are showing the interfaces as running Chorus are telling me their end is “operationally down”. I have tried changing all the settings I have on my end and they are still reporting the same result. I have tried alternative optics, checked light levels with a meter, and even had a Chorus tech out to take a look. Chorus originally pointed to the SFP+ being the issue, now they are saying the config is wrong on my device and that they aren’t “seeing layer two”. I have asked them for any errors on the port or similar and they haven’t reported any to me. I am a little stumped here and would appreciate the advice of anyone doing either 1G or 10G HO Links for UFB with Chorus who could provide any input or any idea of issues they have seen with the configs that would help me diagnose this issue and resolve it. Thank you for your time. Regards Alexander Alexander Neilson Neilson Productions Limited alexander(a)neilson.net.nz 021 329 681 022 456 2326

5 7

Re: [nznog] UFB Upload Issues
by Peter Ensor 09 Oct '14

09 Oct '14

The change in the CFI to DEI occurred between the 802.1q 2005 and the 2011 versions. In 802.1q 2005 section 9.6 Octet 1 bit 5 was defined for use as CFI (Canonical Format Indicator) whereas in the 2011 version of the standard (also shown in section 9.6), this bit has been redefined as the DEI (Discard Eligible Indicator) bit. The diagram is for a single .Q tag but I assume it also applies to additional tags. Cheers, Peter. > From: Nathan Ward [mailto:nznog(a)daork.net] > Sent: Thursday, 9 October 2014 1:26 p.m. > To: Brent Marquis; Dave Mill; Don Stokes > Cc: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz > Subject: Re: [nznog] UFB Upload Issues > > > On 9 October 2014 at 1:09:42 pm, Brent Marquis > (brent.marquis(a)chorus.co.nz(mailto:brent.marquis(a)chorus.co > .nz))<mailto:brent.marquis(a)chorus.co.nz(mailto:brent.marqu > is(a)chorus.co.nz))> wrote: > > > Sorry for the quick reply to myself! > > > > It actually seems like Don might not be 100% correct. > > > > I don?t have IEEE access to get the .1q standard? But > Wikipedia suggests it has been updated in 2005 for CFI to > be DEI: > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1ad > > > > Drop eligible indicator (DEI): a 1-bit field. (formerly > CFI[note > 1](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q#cite_note-2)[2 > ](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q#cite_note-3)) > May be used separately or in conjunction with PCP to > indicate frames eligible to be dropped in the presence of > congestion.[3](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q#ci > te_note-4) > > > With the note suggesting ? ?IEEE 802.1Q-2005 clause 9.6? > > > > If it?s on Wikipedia, it must be true?. Right? J > > The quote above is from the 802.1q page. If you read the > page you link to, the 802.1ad page, you get: > > In IEEE 802.1ad the CFI is replaced by a Drop Eligibility > Indicator (DEI), increasing the functionality of the PCP > field. > > Key bit is ?802.1ad?, not 802.1q. Using 0x88a8 vs > 0x8100/0x9100 is signalling that you?re using 802.1ad vs. > stacked 802.1q, so should set this bit appropriate to the > tag type. I?m with Don on this one - the frame type bits > signal how to interpret the following bits, you can?t just > swap them around. > > People should really just use 0x88a8 - those who aren?t, > can I ask why not? Is it because you?re trying to tunnel > it over a switch that doesn?t support 802.1ad or > something? I?m not saying it?s wrong, I?m interested in > understanding the situations in which you might do this. > > -- > Nathan Ward > This communication, including any attachments, is > confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not > the intended recipient, you should not read it - please > contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use > any part of this communication or disclose anything about > it. Thank you. No confidentiality or privilege is waived > or lost by any mis-transmission or error. Please note that > this communication does not designate an information > system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act > 2002. > >

3 2