3 Apr
2014
3 Apr
'14
4:14 a.m.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Michael Fincham
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 16:52:04 +1300, Dave Mill wrote:
I've obtained some pcaps from both ends and I can see the following changes occurring to a DHCP Request:
1) The transaction ID is changed 2) Option 82 is added. More specifically, sub-option 1 Agent Circuit ID is present and has a valid length. sub-option 2 Agent Remote ID is present, has a length of 0 and no content which wireshark doesn't seem to like much.
Do you know if the circuit was ordered with the "DHCP option"?
Why should a layer 2 circuit need to have such an option? There's no mention of DHCP in: http://www.crownfibre.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Chorus-UFB-Services...