31 Jul
2012
31 Jul
'12
12:26 p.m.
On 1/08/2012 5:19 p.m., James Spenceley wrote:
I think the proposed path by PF was potentially a few ms (~5-8ms) faster than the existing cable.
That's what I was told too, the lower latency courtesy of a somewhat shorter/straighter physical path. Anyway, I asked Southern Cross about pricing and more. Here's the story with their response: http://www.itnews.com.au/News/310541,pacific-fibre-folds-submarine-cable-pla... Hei konā mai,* -- *Juha Saarinen AITTP* *juha.saarinen.org http://juha.saarinen.org Follow me on http://twitter.com/juhasaarinen Twitter http://twitter.com/juhasaarinen