One would hope she'd see the irony of using twitter over the link that she
claims to be broken
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 9, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Tim Price wrote:
Except for where resiliency was down due to previously scheduled
maintenance… Certainly wasn’t seamless from my point of view. But yes,
Clare Curran needs to GTFO
*From:* nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:
nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] *On Behalf Of *Sam Russell
*Sent:* Friday, 9 November 2012 3:27 p.m.
*To:* Al Twohill
*Cc:* nznog
*Subject:* Re: [nznog] Labour alleges failure of Southern Cross Cable
Presumably a redundant link means that nobody loses service when they
accidentally break one of them?
It does seem like an excuse to blame National for not propping up Pacific
Fibre, rather than anything wrong with a redundant set of links failing
over correctly due to a fault, as designed
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 9, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Al Twohill wrote:
On 9 November 2012 15:16, David Robinson wrote:
http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/labour-alleges-failure-of-southern-...
How much substance and how much Political Grandstanding? Yes a second
cable would be nice but be careful saying the sky is falling.
There is a thread discussing it on AUSNOG. Looks like Labour basically
quoted that.
http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/2012-November/015297.html
_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog