I'd support this. NZNOG is not your ISP helpdesk. Nor is it the Helpdesk of the third-party ISP you're having issues with. And it's not a phone directory. It really would be nice to be able to assume that the obvious vectors have been tried first. All too often, that doesn't appear to be the case. I often feel that if you're actually a member of the NZNOG target audience, you should know better than to use the scattergun approach before the obvious, reasonable alternatives have been tried and eliminated. Clearly a broadcast to NZNOG should be an option. But it should be pretty much the last option tried; give established processes and obvious contact lists such as the NOC list a shot first. Mark. On 9/04/2014 5:19 p.m., Dave Mill wrote:
I've been contemplating a post like this for a while.
Does it seem logical that we change our AUP to be something like:
'Please contact me off-list' posts will only be tolerated if you have tried the 'normal means' before doing so.
Normal means would be:
-Phoning the company and asking to talk to someone about your issue. This does often work. -Contacting the appropriate people using the noc-list contacts on the NZNOG website -Emailing the appropriate address (i.e. noc@ or postmaster@)
I'm just getting a bit of sick of NZNOG being used largely as a 'can someone from xyz please contact me off-list' list.
</rant>
And I don't mean to just pick on this thread. It's just been happening a lot lately it seems.
Cheers Dave
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Simon Green
mailto:simon(a)simongreen.net> wrote: On 09/04/14 15:07, Jean-Francois Pirus wrote: > Can a Callplus/Slingshot/Tranzpeer postmaster contact me. > > We're having issue with forward emails for our clients to Callplus > addresses, the clients are complaining mail is being dropped.
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog