One would hope she'd see the irony of using twitter over the link that she claims to be broken Sent from my iPhone On Nov 9, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Tim Price <tim(a)initech.co.nz> wrote: Except for where resiliency was down due to previously scheduled maintenance… Certainly wasn’t seamless from my point of view. But yes, Clare Curran needs to GTFO *From:* nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] *On Behalf Of *Sam Russell *Sent:* Friday, 9 November 2012 3:27 p.m. *To:* Al Twohill *Cc:* nznog *Subject:* Re: [nznog] Labour alleges failure of Southern Cross Cable Presumably a redundant link means that nobody loses service when they accidentally break one of them? It does seem like an excuse to blame National for not propping up Pacific Fibre, rather than anything wrong with a redundant set of links failing over correctly due to a fault, as designed Sent from my iPhone On Nov 9, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Al Twohill <moebiusproject(a)gmail.com> wrote: On 9 November 2012 15:16, David Robinson <nznog(a)karit.geek.nz> wrote: http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/labour-alleges-failure-of-southern-... How much substance and how much Political Grandstanding? Yes a second cable would be nice but be careful saying the sky is falling. There is a thread discussing it on AUSNOG. Looks like Labour basically quoted that. http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/2012-November/015297.html _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog