- NZNOG - lists.nznog.org

.nz namespace to be flattened!
by Andy Linton 10 Oct '13

10 Oct '13

https://internetnz.net.nz/news/media-releases/2013/New-level-Internet-domai…

10 10

Reminder - Call for Papers for NZNOG 2014
by Mike Jager 09 Oct '13

09 Oct '13

A reminder that submissions for presentations at NZNOG 2014 are due in the next couple of weeks. Don't forget that the best local paper will win a trip to APRICOT 2014 in Bangkok, Thailand. As they say, you've gotta be in to win! ---- The NZNOG organising committee invites papers for its 13th annual conference, to be hosted at the Rutherford Hotel, Nelson, New Zealand from 27 – 31 January 2014. There will the three day Workshops 27 – 29 January, a day of tutorials on 29 January with the main conference on 30 – 31 January. The best local conference paper as judged by the trustees in association with the programme committee will win a trip to APRICOT 2014, to be held in Bangkok, Thailand, 18-28 February 2014. So, get writing! Conference objective: The NZNOG conference, workshops and tutorials are a once-a-year opportunity for individuals and organisations involved in Internet operations to meet and share the latest in Internet operations, technologies practises and receive high quality training. The event is unique in New Zealand and attracts technical, skilled individuals with a genuine interest in Internet operations and Internetworking technologies. Submit a paper: Presenters are invited to submit abstracts of their paper for consideration by Monday 21st October. Abstracts should be no more than one page long and provide a summary of your networking-related subject matter. Please note that full slide decks will be required by 18th November. To submit your paper please e-mail: talks(a)nznog.org When considering a presentation, remember that the NZNOG audience is mainly comprised of technical network operators and engineers with a wide range of experience levels from beginners to multi-year experience. There is a strong orientation to offer core skills and basic knowledge in SIGs and to address issues relevant to the day-to-day operations of ISPs and network operators in the conference sessions. Note: The inclusion of a title, bio, topic, abstract, and slides with proposals is not compulsory but will help us determine the quality of your proposal and increase the likelihood it will be accepted. The organising committee will evaluate abstracts based on fit with the conference’s objective and its ability to stimulate lively discussions around the current state of New Zealand networking. The best local paper will be judged by a selection of the trustees and the programme committee. Return flights from New Zealand, accommodation, and conference fees will be covered. It will be expected the best paper is submitted by the winner for presentation at APRICOT. More details on paper submission can be found at http://www.nznog.org/call-for-papers For more information about the conference visit www.nznog.org or contact: talks(a)nznog.org

1 0

Arbor Networks 9th Annual Infrastructure Security Survey
by Sockrider, Gary 09 Oct '13

09 Oct '13

_______________________________________________________________________ Arbor Networks 9th Annual Infrastructure Security Survey Now Open _______________________________________________________________________ Arbor Networks would like to invite you to participate in our annual infrastructure security survey, an important initiative that touches service providers, enterprises, government agencies, universities and other network operators around the world. Please go here to participate in the 2013 survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/FGY6KJD We are requesting that you complete and submit the survey by October 31, 2013. The purpose of the survey is to gauge and report on general security issues, practices, procedures and observations from the industry. All data gathered from the survey will be compiled, analyzed and reported in Arbor's 9th annual Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report which will be published in early 2014. Individual responses will be treated anonymously and no respondent names or company names will appear in the report or accompanying presentations and/or marketing materials. For your reference, our 8th annual Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report, issued earlier this year and based on responses to last year's survey is available here: http://pages.arbornetworks.com/rs/arbor/images/WISR2012_EN.pdf Your industry perspectives are important to Arbor and we value your input. Thank you, in advance, for your participation. With best regards, Arbor Networks

1 0

National Vs International Traffic
by Shane Hanson 07 Oct '13

07 Oct '13

Hello All I'm sure this question has been asked a number of times before but a quick search through the list and a Google pretty much draws a blank. I'm working for a service provider (Mothership) and we're trying to differentiate between national and international traffic. Any pointers? Thanks SHANE lE <mailto:shane(a)mothership.co.nz> shane(a)mothership.co.nz lW <http://mothership.co.nz/> mothership.co.nz lA PO Box 99814, Newmarket lM +64 21 623 903

5 5

Re: [nznog] Speaking of IPv6
by Brad Cowie 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

Hello, I don't run the machine that hosts the list, but figure I should chime in since I can provide the most up to date information. Waikato has a fully working IPv6 upstream and our own prefix (2001:df0:4::/48) we at Wand make good use of v6. The downside is that I haven't seen any other departments on campus adopt IPv6 yet, apart from our HPC group and Music group. list.waikato.ac.nz is a campus-wide service run by our ITS division, I haven't heard much about ITS's IPv6 deployment plans, but I'm not sure that will help much in this case considering our email vendor (postini in this case) doesn't have IPv6 support. I'm pretty sure we'll have to move off postini soon considering Google is planning to close that service down at some point. Hopefully our new email vendor has IPv6 support? Feel free to flick me any other questions on or off list and I'll attempt to provide answers. Cheers, Brad Cowie -- Systems Administrator Wand Group Department of Computer Science The University of Waikato Mobile: +64 27 5888 103 | Office: G.1.32 From: Dean Pemberton <nznog(a)deanpemberton.com> > Date: 2 October 2013 19:24 > Subject: Re: [nznog] Speaking of IPv6 > To: Juha Saarinen <juha(a)saarinen.org> > Cc: "nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz" <NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz> > > > Aww man thats harsh.... but fair. > > Someone from Waikato how are you looking for IPv6 deployment? > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Juha Saarinen <juha(a)saarinen.org> wrote: > > $ host -6 -v list.waikato.ac.nz > > Trying "list.waikato.ac.nz" > > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > > > > $ host list.waikato.ac.nz > > list.waikato.ac.nz has address 130.217.66.63 > > list.waikato.ac.nz mail is handled by 400 > > list.waikato.ac.nz.s200b2.psmtp.com. > > list.waikato.ac.nz mail is handled by 100 > > list.waikato.ac.nz.s200a1.psmtp.com. > > list.waikato.ac.nz mail is handled by 200 > > list.waikato.ac.nz.s200a2.psmtp.com. > > list.waikato.ac.nz mail is handled by 300 > > list.waikato.ac.nz.s200b1.psmtp.com. > > > > -- > > Juha Saarinen > > twitter: juhasaarinen >

1 0

Re: [nznog] "What's the hourly price for a /24?"
by Scott Weeks 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

--- jlaundry(a)jlaundry.com wrote: From: Jed Laundry <jlaundry(a)jlaundry.com> Pardon my ignorance of the APNIC list discussions, but is the point to: 1. allow /24s to be used by different ASes for short periods of time to handle peak demands? I can only think of mobile IP providers in different timezones being a "sensible" example of this. 2. to allow ASes to claim a need for addresses based on short term customer uses? This is an edge case; I've run a couple of events where I needed a /26 for a weekend, which was taken from the provider's existing pool. 3. to mark addresses as leased (i.e. cloud servers) to avoid blacklist hell for the next poor unfortunate soul to use them? (glhf?) ------------------------------------------------------- You forgot 4. to spam. Sorta like hourly rates at a motel... >;-) scott _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

1 0

Refurb Cisco Kit (inside) in NZ
by Skeeve Stevens 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

Hi, Could some people sell Refurbished Cisco kit in NZ contact me, or someone give me some contacts. I'm hoping for someone who is already in NZ so I can have to deal with the extra costs of import duties, shipping, risk, etc. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd skeeve(a)eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud

1 0

"What's the hourly price for a /24?"
by Dean Pemberton 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

Hi All, The subject line is a question I posed to Geoff Huston years ago in response to us both musing what the price to purchase address space would be. I suggested that if it really got that bad, people would be asking about leasing by the hour rather than buying outright. That time looks to be upon us. While not explicitly allowed, nor disallowed by APNIC policy, IP address leasing is becoming a hot topic of discussion on relevant APNIC lists. Should it be allowed? Should it be disallowed? It it were disallowed would that actually stop it? What mechanisms need to be in place to keep it sane? A 'whowas' server for eg Should someone be able to be allocated addresses under a needs based policy just so they can make money leasing them? Does leasing addresses mean that you no longer need them? Should you be required to return the ? These and many more issues are questions I'd like you all to give me feed back on. This topic will come up in APRICOT 2014 in Thailand. I'd like to know a lot more about what you all think about it before I take the mic. Regards Dean -- -- Dean Pemberton Technical Policy Advisor InternetNZ +64 21 920 363 (mob) dean(a)internetnz.net.nz To protect and promote the Internet for New Zealand.

20 41

Speaking of IPv6
by Juha Saarinen 01 Oct '13

01 Oct '13

$ host -6 -v list.waikato.ac.nz Trying "list.waikato.ac.nz" ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached $ host list.waikato.ac.nz list.waikato.ac.nz has address 130.217.66.63 list.waikato.ac.nz mail is handled by 400 list.waikato.ac.nz.s200b2.psmtp.com. list.waikato.ac.nz mail is handled by 100 list.waikato.ac.nz.s200a1.psmtp.com. list.waikato.ac.nz mail is handled by 200 list.waikato.ac.nz.s200a2.psmtp.com. list.waikato.ac.nz mail is handled by 300 list.waikato.ac.nz.s200b1.psmtp.com. -- Juha Saarinen twitter: juhasaarinen

2 1

UFB Right Performing
by Jonathon Exley 01 Oct '13

01 Oct '13

Hi all, Chorus have been developing new UFB service templates through the Right Performing process. The main focus has been on increasing burst sizes to permit better TCP performance, and a corresponding relaxation of the delay and jitter SLA. The latest version has been submitted to the TCF for approval this week. Just in case you don't participate in the TCF, you can download a copy from https://db.tt/RgaqMjYL. If you have any comments/abuse please share them (but don't hassle me about the maths - I didn't write it) [cid:image001.jpg(a)01CEBF8D.35452160] Jonathon Exley Network Specialist Layer 2 T +64 4 498 5602 M +64 27 514 8048 E jonathon.exley(a)chorus.co.nz Level 3, Deloitte House, 10 Brandon Street P O Box 632, Wellington www.chorus.co.nz<http://www.chorus.co.nz> Aon Hewitt Best Employer in Australasia 2013 P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail ________________________________ This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.

1 0