I got a charming email from extra informing me that their flat rate
customers charged @ 69.95 will be going from 256kbit to 2mbit in the
next month, the first I heard of it was the email. Was anyone aware this
was going to happen and it was just me having my head in the sand or is
this as unexpected as I find it.
Geraint Jones
Systems Administrator
French Maid Foods Limited
www.french-maid.net <http://www.french-maid.net/>
Tel: +64 (0)4 568 2687
Fax: +64 (0)4 568 2345
Mob: +64 (0)21 739 240
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Dear Colleague,
This is to notify you that some object(s) in NZRR database
which you either maintain or are listed as to-be-notified have
been added, deleted or changed.
These objects are used to configure the APE and/or WIX route
servers so you can expect the relevant servers to be reloaded
in the near future. The reloading of the servers is staggered
over a period of time so that if you are peering with both
servers, you will maintain at least one BGP session at all
times and consequently a full set of APE and/or WIX routes.
The update causing these changes had the following mail headers:
- From: Andy Linton <asjl(a)citylink.co.nz>
- Cc:
- Subject:
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:01:56 +1300 (NZDT)
- Msg-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410281401420.5844(a)jennings.citylink.co.nz>
NZRR Database Notification Department
---
OBJECT BELOW DELETED:
route: 210.48.101.64/27
descr: Route for Araneo - AS64598
origin: AS64598
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
notify: jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20041027
source: NZRR
Dear Colleague,
This is to notify you that some object(s) in NZRR database
which you either maintain or are listed as to-be-notified have
been added, deleted or changed.
These objects are used to configure the APE and/or WIX route
servers so you can expect the relevant servers to be reloaded
in the near future. The reloading of the servers is staggered
over a period of time so that if you are peering with both
servers, you will maintain at least one BGP session at all
times and consequently a full set of APE and/or WIX routes.
The update causing these changes had the following mail headers:
- From: Andy Linton <asjl(a)citylink.co.nz>
- Cc:
- Subject:
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:59:44 +1300 (NZDT)
- Msg-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410281356090.5844(a)jennings.citylink.co.nz>
NZRR Database Notification Department
---
OBJECT BELOW DELETED:
route: 202.53.189.128/29
descr: Route for Araneo - AS64598
origin: AS64598
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
notify: jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20041027
source: NZRR
---
OBJECT BELOW DELETED:
route: 202.174.161.0/24
descr: Route for Araneo - AS64598
origin: AS64598
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
notify: jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20041027
source: NZRR
---
OBJECT BELOW DELETED:
route: 210.48.109.224/27
descr: Route for Araneo - AS64598
origin: AS64598
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
notify: jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20041027
source: NZRR
/me brushes the sand off his ears ;-P
Geraint Jones
Systems Administrator
French Maid Foods Limited
www.french-maid.net
Tel: +64 (0)4 568 2687
Fax: +64 (0)4 568 2345
Mob: +64 (0)21 739 240
-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Broadley [mailto:drew(a)corrupt.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:24 PM
To: Geraint Jones
Cc: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
Subject: Re: [nznog] ADSL @ Home
Geraint Jones wrote:
> I got a charming email from extra informing me that their flat rate
> customers charged @ 69.95 will be going from 256kbit to 2mbit in the
> next month, the first I heard of it was the email. Was anyone aware
this
> was going to happen and it was just me having my head in the sand or
is
> this as unexpected as I find it.
Is this really on-topic ?
Answer: yes, your head is in the sand,
http://www.telecom-media.co.nz/releases_detail.asp?id=3096 :)
- Drew
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Dear Colleague,
This is to notify you that some object(s) in NZRR database
which you either maintain or are listed as to-be-notified have
been added, deleted or changed.
These objects are used to configure the APE and/or WIX route
servers so you can expect the relevant servers to be reloaded
in the near future. The reloading of the servers is staggered
over a period of time so that if you are peering with both
servers, you will maintain at least one BGP session at all
times and consequently a full set of APE and/or WIX routes.
The update causing these changes had the following mail headers:
- From: Andy Linton <asjl(a)citylink.co.nz>
- Cc:
- Subject: [CityLink #1422] Changes to AS64598 (fwd)
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:28:34 +1300 (NZDT)
- Msg-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410281227470.5286(a)jennings.citylink.co.nz>
NZRR Database Notification Department
---
PREVIOUS OBJECT:
route-set: AS9439:RS-ROUTES:AS64598
descr: Route set advertised to AS9439 by Araneo - AS64598
members: 202.53.189.128/29,
202.174.161.0/24^24-29,
210.48.109.224/27^27-29,
210.48.101.64/27^27-29
admin-c: RPA1-NZRR
tech-c: RPA1-NZRR
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
notify: jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20041027
source: NZRR
REPLACED BY:
route-set: AS9439:RS-ROUTES:AS64598
descr: advertised to AS9439 by Araneo - AS64598
members: 210.48.109.104/29,
210.48.109.112/29
admin-c: RPA1-NZRR
tech-c: RPA1-NZRR
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
notify: jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20041028
source: NZRR
---
OBJECT BELOW CREATED:
route: 210.48.109.104/29
descr: Route for Araneo - AS64598
origin: AS64598
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
notify: jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20041028
source: NZRR
Dear Colleague,
This is to notify you that some object(s) in NZRR database
which you either maintain or are listed as to-be-notified have
been added, deleted or changed.
These objects are used to configure the APE and/or WIX route
servers so you can expect the relevant servers to be reloaded
in the near future. The reloading of the servers is staggered
over a period of time so that if you are peering with both
servers, you will maintain at least one BGP session at all
times and consequently a full set of APE and/or WIX routes.
The update causing these changes had the following mail headers:
- From: Andy Linton <asjl(a)citylink.co.nz>
- Cc:
- Subject: [CityLink #1421] Changes to AS64597 (fwd)
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:27:23 +1300 (NZDT)
- Msg-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410281226020.5286(a)jennings.citylink.co.nz>
NZRR Database Notification Department
---
PREVIOUS OBJECT:
route-set: AS9439:RS-ROUTES:AS64597
descr: Route set advertised to AS9439 by Araneo at RNZ - AS64597
members: 210.48.109.224/27
admin-c: RPA1-NZRR
tech-c: RPA1-NZRR
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: jon.brewer(a)att.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20040801
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20040908
source: NZRR
REPLACED BY:
route-set: AS9439:RS-ROUTES:AS64597
descr: advertised to AS9439 by Araneo - AS64597
members: 202.53.189.128/29,
210.48.101.64/27^27-29,
210.48.109.224/27^27-29,
202.174.161.0/24^24-29
admin-c: RPA1-NZRR
tech-c: RPA1-NZRR
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
notify: jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20041028
source: NZRR
---
OBJECT BELOW CREATED:
route: 202.53.189.128/29
descr: Route for Araneo - AS64597
origin: AS64597
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
notify: jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20041028
source: NZRR
---
OBJECT BELOW CREATED:
route: 210.48.101.64/27
descr: Route for Araneo - AS64597
origin: AS64597
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
notify: jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20041028
source: NZRR
---
OBJECT BELOW CREATED:
route: 210.48.109.224/27
descr: Route for Araneo - AS64597
origin: AS64597
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
notify: jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20041028
source: NZRR
---
OBJECT BELOW CREATED:
route: 202.174.161.0/24
descr: Route for Araneo - AS64597
origin: AS64597
notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net
notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
notify: jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz
mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ
changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20041028
source: NZRR
Well, I've never met Bruce, and I do read Aardvark most days, but I
think it would be good to get someone that really _knows_ what the
impact of reducing the line speed on latency will be.
We have a few dslams here for testing but they're been used for real
work right now.
Anyone _know_ what the effect will be?
Cheers - Neil G
>>> Richard Nelson <richardn(a)cs.waikato.ac.nz> 22/10/2004 12:44:56 p.m.
>>>
Maybe you misread it, there is a 'but' in the sentance:
"This will likely increase latency for all but those on the full-speed
JetStream plans ..."
Richard.
Craig Spiers wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> Reading todays article on http://www.aardvark.co.nz/ he raves on
about
> 'increased latency'
>
>
>
> Would I be right in saying the latency would only increase on lower
speed
> jetstream plans - as it takes longer for the packets to pass over a
smaller
> pipe.
>
>
>
> Why is he talking about it increasing latency on full rate jetstream
plans?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> NZNOG mailing list
> NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
> http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
NOTICE: This message contains privileged and confidential
information intended only for the use of the addressee
named above. If you are not the intended recipient of
this message you are hereby notified that you must not
disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it.
If you have received this message in error please
notify Allied Telesyn Research Ltd immediately.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender has the
authority to issue and specifically states them to
be the views of Allied Telesyn Research.
Just received:
Return-Path: <www(a)forcartex.com.tw>
Delivered-To: unix.co.nz-barry(a)unix.co.nz
Received: (qmail 57023 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2004 00:25:24 -0000
Received: from www(a)forcartex.com.tw by firewall.unix.co.nz by uid 82 with
qmail-scanner-1.22
(uvscan: v4.3.20/v4396. Clear:RC:0(219.88.242.3):.
Processed in 0.334605 secs); 22 Oct 2004 00:25:24 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: www(a)forcartex.com.tw via firewall.unix.co.nz
X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.22 (Clear:RC:0(219.88.242.3):. Processed in 0.334605
secs)
Received: from unknown (HELO dbmail-mx3.orcon.net.nz) (219.88.242.3)
by smtp.unix.co.nz with SMTP; 22 Oct 2004 00:25:24 -0000
Received: from mail.unix.co.nz (firewall.unix.co.nz [219.88.241.242])
by dbmail-mx3.orcon.net.nz (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-14) with SMTP id
i9M0PONQ030574
for <blacklabel(a)orcon.net.nz>; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:25:25 +1300
Received: (qmail 57013 invoked by uid 89); 22 Oct 2004 00:25:23 -0000
Delivered-To: barry(a)southafrica.co.nz
Received: (qmail 57007 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2004 00:25:22 -0000
Received: from www(a)forcartex.com.tw by firewall.unix.co.nz by uid 82 with
qmail-scanner-1.22
(uvscan: v4.3.20/v4396. Clear:RC:0(211.22.18.59):.
Processed in 0.985909 secs); 22 Oct 2004 00:25:22 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: www(a)forcartex.com.tw via firewall.unix.co.nz
X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.22 (Clear:RC:0(211.22.18.59):. Processed in 0.985909
secs)
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.forcartex.com.tw) (211.22.18.59)
by smtp.unix.co.nz with SMTP; 22 Oct 2004 00:25:21 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.forcartex.com.tw [127.0.0.1])
by mail.forcartex.com.tw (Postfix) with ESMTP id B207F12BC24
for <barry(a)southafrica.co.nz>; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:25:18 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mail.forcartex.com.tw ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (www.forcartex.com.tw [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 10715-03 for <barry(a)southafrica.co.nz>;
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:25:18 +0800 (CST)
Received: by mail.forcartex.com.tw (Postfix, from userid 80)
id 4D67012BCA8; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:24:21 +0800 (CST)
To: barry(a)southafrica.co.nz
Subject: Westpac: SERVICE MESSAGE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Westpac New Zealand <service(a)westpac.co.nz>
Reply-To: service(a)westpac.co.nz
X-Mailer: PHP/4.3.8
Message-Id: <20041022002421.4D67012BCA8(a)mail.forcartex.com.tw>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:24:21 +0800 (CST)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75-1, clamav-milter version 0.75c
on dbmail-mx3
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at forcartex.com.tw
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER Improper use of control character (char 0D hex)
in message header 'MIME-Version': MIME-Version: 1.0\r\n
Received-SPF: none (dbmail-mx3.orcon.net.nz: 219.88.241.242 is neither
permitted nor denied by domain of forcartex.com.tw)
receiver=dbmail-mx3.orcon.net.nz; client-ip=219.88.241.242;
helo=mail.unix.co.nz; envelope-from=www(a)forcartex.com.tw;
x-software=spfmilter 0.93 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/;
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-DCC: :
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on
firewall.unix.co.nz
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_TITLE_UNTITLED,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=2.64
_____
From: Westpac New Zealand [mailto:service(a)westpac.co.nz]
Sent: Friday, 22 October 2004 1:24 p.m.
To: barry(a)southafrica.co.nz
Subject: Westpac: SERVICE MESSAGE
<http://www.westpac.co.nz/w_nz.gif>
Dear Westpac customer,
Recently there has been a large number of identity theft attempts targeting
Westpac customers. In order to safeguard your account, we require that you
confirm your banking details.
This process is mandatory, and if not completed within the nearest time your
account may be subject to temporary suspension.
To securely confirm your Westpac account details, please fill in the form
that will follow after signing in at:
http://www.westpac.co.nz/personal/Checking/OnlineBanking/Internet_Banking/in
dex.cfm
<http://www.saracie.org/secure/online/adtrack/IOLB/newSession/nz.htm>
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter and for using Westpac!
Westpac Banking Corporation ABN 33 007 457 141, incorporated in Australia
(New Zealand division).
CopyrightC1999-2004 Westpac Banking Corporation
Hi guys,
Reading todays article on http://www.aardvark.co.nz/ he raves on about
'increased latency'
Would I be right in saying the latency would only increase on lower speed
jetstream plans - as it takes longer for the packets to pass over a smaller
pipe.
Why is he talking about it increasing latency on full rate jetstream plans?
Cheers
