As Ewen McNeill put it,
> From: Ewen McNeill [mailto:ewen(a)naos.co.nz]
> Sent: Sunday, 10 October 2004 9:02 p.m.
> To: Mark Foster
> Cc: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
> Subject: Re: [nznog] Spam from local sources?
[...]
> Meanwhile the reaction is hopefully a sufficient demonstration that
> sending advertising (spam) to "individuals who we have found
> on the New
> Zealand internet" is fairly counter productive if your aim is
> to attract
> new customers. Particularly when the spam goes to those involved in
> running the networks.
>
> So hopefully there will not be a repeat.
The same could usefully be said of much of this thread's content.
This thread has long since ceased to have any operational relevance it
may just possibly once have possessed. I also see too little of the
respect for other subscribers which the AUP requires. Repeat
contributors who don't stop now can expect to see warnings as described
in paragraph ten of the AUP.
There are lots of high-volume forums on the interweb which aren't
expecially focussed on a particular subject. This isn't one of them.
- Donald Neal
Donald Neal |Palmerdale: Are you in charge here?
Technical Specialist |The Doctor: No, but I'm full of
Operations Engineering | ideas.
Integration & Services Division +-----------------------------------
Alcatel NZ Ltd - Telecom's network operations manager
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This communication, including any attachments, is confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read
it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not
copy or use any part of this communication or disclose
anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this
communication does not designate an information system for
the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
