- NZNOG - lists.nznog.org

Re: [nznog] APE, citylink, LOTR thingy
by Jamie Baddeley 30 Nov '03

30 Nov '03

was Go, Go, od, G, ood, G, G, , No, Now, B, a, Ba, Bad. Liv Tyler looks lovely when she's not stuttering and jerking around. 384 kbps now starting to resemble the mjpeg. jamie >>> Simon Lyall <simon(a)darkmere.gen.nz> 1/12/2003 4:16:36 PM >>> The main website just manages to load but the streams are overloaded to the point of being broken. Hows it look to everyone else? -- Simon J. Lyall. | Very Busy | Mail: simon(a)darkmere.gen.nz "To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT. _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

1 0

RE: [nznog] APE, citylink, LOTR thingy
by mark.harris＠ssc.govt.nz 30 Nov '03

30 Nov '03

Agreed. They come and go, but they go more than they come. > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Lyall [mailto:simon(a)darkmere.gen.nz] > Sent: 01 December 2003 16:17 > To: nznog > Subject: [nznog] APE, citylink, LOTR thingy > > > > The main website just manages to load but the streams are > overloaded to > the point of being broken. > > Hows it look to everyone else? > > -- > Simon J. Lyall. | Very Busy | Mail: simon(a)darkmere.gen.nz > "To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT. > > _______________________________________________ > NZNOG mailing list > NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz > http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog >

1 0

Re: [nznog] APE, citylink, LOTR thingy
by Ewen McNeill 30 Nov '03

30 Nov '03

In message <Pine.LNX.4.56.0312011612240.8002(a)green.darkmere.gen.nz>, Simon Lyall writes: >The main website just manages to load but the streams are overloaded to >the point of being broken. In Wellington (across WIX) I can see: - the flick motion Axis thing, but only inside IE which uses the plugin (the javascript stuff is just completely overloaded); - the 128Kbps stream (but not the 384Kbps stream) Which is sort of okay. But some things seem to be struggling under the load. I guess in theory there's another set of hardware in Auckland seeing different load. Ewen

1 0

The New Zealand Network Operators' Group
by Donald Neal 30 Nov '03

30 Nov '03

The New Zealand Network Operators' Group The New Zealand Network Operators' Group (NZNOG) has no king, president or formal membership. At present it consists of the subscribers to this mailing list, which anyone is free to join. A face-to-face gathering is to take place in Hamilton on January 29 and 30 2004, hosted by the WAND group. Registration is open now, and a draft programme is due out shortly. See http://www.nznog.org/ for more details. Also see http://thursdaynightcurry.com/about.html if you live in or near Wellington or Auckland. Operators' Contact List See http://www.usenet.net.nz/noc/ for operational contact details for most New Zealand ISP's. These are intended for use by other network operators rather than by most customers. Internet Exchanges See http://www.ape.net.nz/ for details of the Auckland Peering Exchange and those connected there. See http://www.wix.net.nz/ for the Wellington Internet Exchange. And possibly http://www.citylink.co.nz/information/news/nr1068413489.html . About This Mailing List This list has around six hundred addresses subscribed. You may only post to the list from a subscribed address. A number of people subscribe addresses which do not receive email purely to allow posting from them. The NZNOG mailing list is provided through a server at The University of Waikato, and is administered by an employee of Alcatel NZ Ltd. Neither of these organisations, nor the administrator, is responsible for its content. NZNOG Mailing List Acceptable Use Policy The NZNOG mailing list exists to provide a forum for the exchange of technical information and the discussion of implementation issues that require cooperation among New Zealand network service providers. In order to continue to provide a useful forum for discussion of relevant technical issues, users of the list are asked to respect the following guidelines. 1. Discussion will focus on Internet operational and technical issues. 2. Discussion related to meetings of network service providers is appropriate. 3. Discussion unrelated to these topics is not appropriate. 4. Postings to multiple mailing lists are discouraged. 5. Postings that include foul language, character assassination, and lack of respect for other participants are unacceptable. 6. Blatant product or service marketing is unacceptable. 7. Postings of a political, philosophical or legal nature are discouraged. 8. Postings to the list should be in ASCII or MIME encoded as text/plain. Attachments should not be sent to the list. To present a document, a suitable URL may be referred to. For documents of general interest, the use of proprietary file formats is discouraged. 9. Breaches of list etiquette should be dealt with privately with the offending list user, and should not result in complaints being sent to the list. 10. A person repeatedly breaching list etiquette shall receive warnings from the list administrator. A further breach after the second such warning within thirty days shall result in the offender being unsubscribed from the list. Other action may also be taken to block postings to the list by the offender. Any such unsubscription is to be immediately announced to the list. Mailing List Archives A full archive is available at http://list.waikato.ac.nz/archives/nznog/ Any message sent to the list will be archived and made available on the web automatically. Changes are not made to the archive on request, though the administrator remains happy to assist the Office of the Privacy Commissioner should any complaint be laid with that office. One way to search the archive is to use google and prefix your search with site:list.waikato.ac.nz . Subscribing to the List See http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog to subscribe. Donald Neal NZNOG Mailing List Owner/Administrator/Muggins ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Peering question
by Juha Saarinen 30 Nov '03

30 Nov '03

http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/UNID/8E589BD9394A5141CC256DEB00084747?O… 'Thompson also uses a different terminology to describe peering. "It's a much abused term. Peering really only happens between companies of a similar size. What we're talking about is interconnection." ' Is this the generally accepted definition of peering? -- Juha

5 10

Sale of Domainz
by DPF 28 Nov '03

28 Nov '03

Notice of the sale of Domainz is being sent by post to ISPs, but a quick e-mail here may also prove effective in reaching any interested purchasers. The advert relating to the sale of Domainz is at http://www.internetnz.net.nz/sale-of-domainz-nbr-ad.pdf, as per the announcement below. All inquiries are best directed to Tim Russell of Deloitte Corporate Finance at the details below. DPF On Fri, 30 May 2003 13:35:44 +1200, Peter Macaulay <exedir(a)internetnz.net.nz> wrote: >Further to our earlier announcements, the public aspect of the sale of >Domainz is under way. An advertisement is in today's (Friday 29 May) >National Business Review. A copy will be posted on the web site at 1830 >tonight. >Feel free to pass on this information to any parties that may have a >genuine interest. The contact is >Tim Russell >+64 9 303 0857 >timrussell(a)deloitte.co.nz > >-- >Peter Macaulay >Executive Director >InternetNZ >Direct +64 4 495 2113 -- E-mail: david(a)farrar.com ICQ: 29964527 MSN: dpf666(a)hotmail.com

22 42

lotr webcam in fast forward?
by Barry Murphy 27 Nov '03

27 Nov '03

Anyone else seeing the courtney cam in fastforward? Does 2second+ per second. Look at the time at the top of the screen, also notice the way people walk. Had this problem from corporate lan at work and also from home on 128k jetstart. Barry

5 4

RE: [nznog] Peering question
by Donald Neal 27 Nov '03

27 Nov '03

> -----Original Message----- > From: nznog-bounces+Donald.Neal=telecom.co.nz(a)list.waikato.ac.nz > [mailto:nznog-bounces+Donald.Neal=telecom.co.nz(a)list.waikato.ac.nz]On > Behalf Of Ewan Cowie > Sent: Friday, 28 November 2003 10:36 > To: NZ NOG > Subject: RE: [nznog] Peering question > > > What interests me is this statement. > > "Throughout 2002, however, the Commission received complaints > from ISPs who were excluded from the domestic peering > agreements. Generally, the complaints concerned the fact that > none of the Tier 1 service providers paid for use of the > complainants' networks for data transmission yet the > complainants were required to pay fees to use the Tier 1s' networks". > > The Commerce Commission is bound to find similar opinions > locally as the ACCC did in Australia. If this turns into a > poo fight, will everyone just end up charging everyone for > "interconnection" just to avoid the complexities that the > peering issue raises? There also remains the question of the effect on the landscape both politically and technically if the Commerce Commission does proceed to mandate unbundled "Public Data Network Backhaul" among other things, as proposed in their September draft report. I'd hesitate to predict doom at this stage, in part because accurate predications of any kind are a bit of a challenge. Especially when they're about the future. Donald Neal | "They won't wobble. They won't! Technical Specialist | I shall lean against them Operations Engineering | myself, and I'm 6ft 6in. I will Integration & Services Divn. | personally eliminate wobble." Alcatel NZ Ltd | All opinions mine only. | - Russell T. Davies ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

RE: [nznog] Peering question
by Ewan Cowie 27 Nov '03

27 Nov '03

What interests me is this statement. "Throughout 2002, however, the Commission received complaints from ISPs who were excluded from the domestic peering agreements. Generally, the complaints concerned the fact that none of the Tier 1 service providers paid for use of the complainants' networks for data transmission yet the complainants were required to pay fees to use the Tier 1s' networks". The Commerce Commission is bound to find similar opinions locally as the ACCC did in Australia. If this turns into a poo fight, will everyone just end up charging everyone for "interconnection" just to avoid the complexities that the peering issue raises? Should this occur it is going to boost cost for the consumer (assuming that ISPs aim to retain the same profit margin - which I am sure many will)and could have negative effects on market growth, and the spread of Internet technology/connectivity in NZ. Of course nothing bad may happen at all, but today I am prophesying doom. Doom Ewan Cowie -----Original Message----- From: nznog-bounces+Ewan.Cowie=telecom.co.nz(a)list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces+Ewan.Cowie=telecom.co.nz(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Juha Saarinen Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 8:50 AM Cc: NZ NOG Subject: Re: [nznog] Peering question Juha Saarinen wrote: > http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/UNID/8E589BD9394A5141CC256DEB00084 > 747?OpenDocument A mate spotted this one: 'Thompson points to overseas markets where interconnection and peering are well-established practices. "If you look at the US, the likes of WorldCom or UUNet peer with each other, but they charge smaller players for interconnection."' Yes, I can well imagine that WCOM and UUNET would "peer with each other". ;-) -- Juha _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

LoTR auckland webcam streams
by Simon Blake 26 Nov '03

26 Nov '03

Hi all Could somebody in Auckland who peers at APE and recieves 202.7.4.x/24 from the route servers please direct a browser at http://palantir.citylink.co.nz/courtenay/ and http://palantir.citylink.co.nz/reading/ and tell me if you see a particularly miserable piece of courtenay place weather. I believe they're both going, but the anycast makes it a little harder than usual to test. Cheers Si

2 3