- NZNOG - lists.nznog.org

RE: [nznog] IPv6 in NZ?
by Paul Brislen 04 May '03

04 May '03

In defence of the Xtra PR spokeswoman Anna, I have to say she is entirely new to the world of ICT and when I asked her about IP numbers/addresses she'd never heard the term before... I asked her about IPv6 more as a separate point ("... and what about plans to roll out IPv6?") rather than as a solution to the allocation issue... I guess it's not really on topic to have it in the story alongside the rest but she had so little to say on the matter (oddly) that there really wasn't enough for a separate story.

2 1

OT - Remote access
by rod_christie＠wilsonandhorton.co.nz 01 May '03

01 May '03

OT - Is anyone working on anything new for high-speed remote access, for areas that will never yet DSL or other cable services? Satellite with dialup is fine, but after 15 km of copper, having bypassed electric fence units, then factoring encapsulation, corporate VPN, and remote access client to said box, more gg's would be good. It's a question I get asked from time to time. Any suggestions would be good. Reply of list. Cheers Rod Christie APN News & Media *************************************************************************** This may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Wilson & Horton Limited. For more information on Wilson & Horton please visit our web site at http://www.wilsonandhorton.co.nz ***************************************************************************

2 1

Re: [nznog] people blocking "all APNIC space"
by Steve Phillips 30 Apr '03

30 Apr '03

Just recently came across another blocking of 210.0.0.0/8 with chat servers. While probably not considered by many to be a productive service :-) it does still show attitudes that say "APNIC ? forget it" and this attitude appears to be markedly prevalent amongst US based admins and now appears to be expanding to cover services other than e-mail. -- Steve. At 11:46 30/04/2003 +1200, Alastair Johnson wrote: >Yes - we have seen this quite reguarly. Specifically, the >210/8 network seems particuarly disliked. > >pbi.net used to block connections from 210/8 but not from >202/7 for a good part of 2002. > > >We have customers complain about it every so often, but I forget >what the most recent case was - some little ISP in TX, IIRC. > > >aj... > >On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Joe Abley wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:35:10 -0400 > > From: Joe Abley <jabley(a)automagic.org> > > To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz > > Subject: [nznog] people blocking "all APNIC space" > > > > There's recurring wisdom on other lists that people outside the Asia > > Pacific region routinely block "all APNIC space" in order to reduce the > > amount of spam they receive (the most recent example was on NANOG, when > > someone inferred that APNIC address space was useless because it is so > > regularly blocked). > > > > I've run MTAs numbered within 202/8 and 203/8 before, and I've never > > noticed a problem; if the practice of blocking all APNIC space was that > > commonplace, I would have expected to have noticed. Maybe I was just > > lucky, or maybe these block-happy ISPs don't include 202/8 and 203/8 in > > "all APNIC space". > > > > Anybody here noticed widespread blocking of any APNIC ranges by ISPs > > elsewhere in the world? > > > > > > Joe > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Nznog mailing list > > Nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz > > http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog > > > >--- >Never attempt with words what can be achieved with a flame thrower. > >_______________________________________________ >Nznog mailing list >Nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz >http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

2 1

WTS: CISCO AS5800 192VOX 2CT3 - new! Oboxed - LOW PRICE!
by cavin＠getintoweb.com 26 Apr '03

26 Apr '03

We have 2 units in stock ready to ship - GREAT & LOW PRICE! OBO: CISCO AS5800 ACCESS SERVER w/ DS58-192VOX + DS58-2CT3 FULLY LOADED !!! (1 of) AS5800 Top Level Dial Shelf Controller Card (2 of) AS5800 12-Port T3 Ingress Line Card The AS5800 supports up to two channelized T3 (CT3) interfaces. Each CT3 interface delivers up to 672 calls. info: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/as/as5800/prodlit/as58_ov.htm They are new, open box. - GREAT & LOW PRICE! OBO Standard 90 day warranty Please email me or call me directly. Ask us for Cisco 12416 OC3 (4)OC12 OC48 6DS3 cards or 15454 chassis. Cavin PP 408-921-5028 cavin(a)getintoweb.com

1 0

Telstra Outage
by robbie_gernandt＠wilsonandhorton.co.nz 16 Apr '03

16 Apr '03

Did anybody else experience problems with Telstra IP Services this morning ( 00:30 to 02:00 and 06:50 to 7:50)? Apparently one of their main core switches had a faulty port or something, I'm still waiting for a report Robbie Gernandt Network Consultant APN News & Media robbie_gernandt(a)apn.co.nz Mobile: (64) 21 736 086 DDI: (64) 9 977 9577 Fax: (64) 9 373 6411 *************************************************************************** This may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Wilson & Horton Limited. For more information on Wilson & Horton please visit our web site at http://www.wilsonandhorton.co.nz ***************************************************************************

2 1

IPv6 in NZ?
by Juha Saarinen 15 Apr '03

15 Apr '03

Noticed on: http://snurl.com/1638 that Xtra "isn't considering moving to" IPv6 and also claims that "none of the ISPs are", presumably meaning the NZ ones. I know this is not correct, and that Joe Abley and Clear were at it back in '98 already, with the Uni of Canterbury. Where are things at with IPv6 in NZ now though? -- Juha Saarinen

8 8

RE: [nznog] IPv6 in NZ?
by Zanetti David 15 Apr '03

15 Apr '03

Jeremy Brooking wrote on 16 April 2003: > On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 11:56, Zanetti David wrote: > > Please let us not head down the path of handing out RFC1918 space to end > > users as if this is a real connection. That way leads to Much Pain with Less > > Than Friendly Protocols. Which seems to be an awful lot beyond CS weenies :) > > 36878 players and 3132 clans ranked on 3 servers in 7 days. > > I wouldnt exactly say 36 thousand paying customers are 'weenies' Never said they weren't paying customers. :) -- David Zanetti <david.zanetti(a)nzpost.co.nz> Desk: +64-4-496-4005 Mobile: +64-25-832-572 "Hope.. is a dangerous thing" This email with any attachments is confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If it is not intended for you please reply immediately, destroy it and do not copy, disclose or use it in any way.

1 0

RE: [nznog] IPv6 in NZ?
by Zanetti David 15 Apr '03

15 Apr '03

Nathan Ward wrote on 16 April 2003: > In that case RFC1918 space can be used... else beware the whining gamer > who can't play CounterStrike with a v6 address. Please let us not head down the path of handing out RFC1918 space to end users as if this is a real connection. That way leads to Much Pain with Less Than Friendly Protocols. Which seems to be an awful lot beyond CS weenies :) The day an ISP hands me an address which is RFC1918 is the day I switch away. -- David Zanetti <david.zanetti(a)nzpost.co.nz> Desk: +64-4-496-4005 Mobile: +64-25-832-572 "Hope.. is a dangerous thing" This email with any attachments is confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If it is not intended for you please reply immediately, destroy it and do not copy, disclose or use it in any way.

3 2

Re: [nznog] IPv6 in NZ?
by Nathan Ward 15 Apr '03

15 Apr '03

In that case RFC1918 space can be used... else beware the whining gamer who can't play CounterStrike with a v6 address. Nathan Ward Donald Neal wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Nathan Ward [mailto:nward(a)esphion.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, 16 April 2003 10:58 >>To: Jeremy Brooking >>Cc: NZNOG >>Subject: Re: [nznog] IPv6 in NZ? >> >> >>It is probably also worth noting that the article implies >>that v6 would >>fix the problem... >>This isn't really true as v4 will still have to be available.. >> >> > >But not to all of the people all of the time. The bulk of traffic from Xtra end users will presumably be going to Xtra's own boxes - email, proxy cache and games. > >- Donald Neal >(all opinions my own, etc.) > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >"This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. >If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read >it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not >copy or use any part of this communication or disclose >anything about it. Thank you." > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > >

1 0

RE: [nznog] tranzpeer leaking at APE
by Robert Purdy (DSL AK) 14 Apr '03

14 Apr '03

We have also had one of our main providers leaking the global routing table into our routers. Its time to heed Joes advice and ensure your max prefixes are set (or at least your filtering is correctly configured) Cheers Rob Purdy -----Original Message----- From: Joe Abley [mailto:jabley(a)automagic.org] Sent: Monday, 14 April 2003 5:14 p.m. To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: [nznog] tranzpeer leaking at APE 192.203.154.46 in AS 9790 seems to be leaking a global table to peers across the APE at the moment; if you aren't filtering (or don't have maximum-prefix limits set) and you were wondering where all your traffic is going, it might be going that way. _______________________________________________ Nznog mailing list Nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

1 0