- NZNOG - lists.nznog.org

NASA Television Streaming - Multicast or Unicast
by WALLY 19 Jan '02

19 Jan '02

Hello All, I've been trying to stream NASA Television into our television repeater CH 39 UHF here in Auckland for some time now. This will reduce the potential risk of radio hams losing CH 39 UHF. Raido Hams have recently lost 440 MHz to 449.750 MHz our previous TV reapeater input frequency. I know that the CH 39 UHF power levels are low with new linking equiptment being constructed and purchased.A power up grade is on the cards also. We have a high power broadcast tv transmitter but nowhere to install it without complaints (resource consents, power and site costs etc).We are unable to run this high power transmitter at our current site as there is no room for it. The club arrangement is a non profit order.This is a problem also. I hope this year will be an expansion year for CH 39 UHF. Currently we are under pressure such as the MED,RSM UHF TV call to for expressions of interest for community tv licences (CH 35 to 42).The other option is to apply for an ad-hoc licence after the first round of community licences have been let.If there are any left.Yes,ad-hoc as the MED,RSM call it. Link to MED. http://www.med.govt.nz/rsm/licensing/uhftveoi.html NASATV cannot be pulled off direct satellite here in New. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Multicasting I've not had the support from large ISPs to accomodate this. The CH 39 UHF Television Radio Ham exercise runs at low cost. Were trying to promote NASATV and encourage the public of all ages to get educated and have fun on the internet and internet ham radio. NASATV has many web sites constantly informing the world wide public to gain access and learn something in their lives.These web sites are often transmitted via CH 39 UHF and hopefully promote and encourage people to become aware of the need to have internet comunications.Get connected and live again. I see this as a win,win for all. 7kbps to 13kbps is not what broadband is about.The buffering is on and off constantly. My Jetstart service has some what been reduced ( some services disabled,Load Balancing ,IP assend IP desend,Multicasting disabled etc ). I have two Jetstart accounts with Telecom Xtra. All I really need is a quality multicast connection at no less than 64kbps.I can't de-compress 28kbps well enough to an acceptable level,tv-out full screen etc.100Kbps is even better but too costly at present.300kbps flys and de-compresses well.Its very expensive and still stops and starts with no connection or 7kbps to 16kbps with no picture and audio breaking up. Whats missing in customer contracts is the information disclosing what features (hardware or filters and services) are disabled or dis-allowed.A customer believes that they are purchasing full access to where they intend to connect. Thanks all, Wally Muzyka, Radio Ham ZL1VWM, NASATV Supporter. Email: zl1vwm(a)xtra.co.nz PS: The Auckland VHF Group club rooms can be made available for a group of say up to fifty people if you get stuck sorting out a place for your first NZNOG Conference.It's in Hazel Ave,Mt Roskill.The building is of school class room size sited on the Council Reserve.I know of another radio ham Simon from Cisco who may wish to rally up support for NZNOG.There are other radio hams that work in the IP industry also.Would you like to invite them to NZNOG Conference also or have a closed meeting instead.

4 3

mailing list request
by zl1vwm＠xtra.co.nz 18 Jan '02

18 Jan '02

subscribe Wally Muzyka - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Fwd: Re: Updated topic list.
by Mark Foster 18 Jan '02

18 Jan '02

Oops, forgot reply-all... >Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 13:58:38 +1300 >To: Lin Nah <lin(a)darkmere.gen.nz> >From: Mark Foster <blakjak(a)blakjak.net> >Subject: Re: Updated topic list. > >Seconded. Any objections? ;) > > > >At 13:07 19/01/2002 +1300, you wrote: > >>On 16 Jan 2002, Dean Pemberton wrote: >> >> > Ok - I'm using the list that Andreas sent out as a basis for this. >> > I'm unsure if the Contributors lines were people who had expressed an >> > interest to present - or who people WANTED to present. So I'm going to >> > split them up, into offered/wanted. >> >>Nominate Dean for NZNOG Conference Content coordinator? >> >>Lin >> >>- >>To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz >>where the body of your message reads: >>unsubscribe nznog - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

Updated topic list.
by Dean Pemberton 18 Jan '02

18 Jan '02

Ok - I'm using the list that Andreas sent out as a basis for this. I'm unsure if the Contributors lines were people who had expressed an interest to present - or who people WANTED to present. So I'm going to split them up, into offered/wanted. ############################################ - Wireless beyond 2.4 GHz - Wireless Network Security Issues - Network Sniffing demo. - Free Community Wireless *Interest in this has been expressed* Contributors: Offered to present: Dean Pemberton Wanted to see present: Anyone who has built or wants to build a free community wireless network. People from WalkerWireless or Citylink about their plans to use wireless to take over the world. ############################################ - Voice over IP - end-user telephony and Toll-bypass *Much interest expressed* Contributors: Wanted to see present: Cisco Citylink Any of the telco's if they are thinking of offering VoiP gateways. ############################################ - Security and Abuse - SPAM - SOP6 and freedom on the net - DDoS attacks *Much interest in DDos - less in Spam and SOP6* Contributors: YOUR NAME HERE! Wanted to see present: Any company doing DDoS detection work ############################################ - MPLS (Intro/overview) - rfc2547bis MPLS VPN's *Didn't see much interest, flagged for deletion ############################################ - OSPF/ISIS/BGP (anything that people want to know) *Some interest but not a whole lot* In order for this to go ahead I need some more scope. What do people want to know? Contributors: Offered: Dean Pemberton ############################################ - IPv6. Migration strategies *Hot topic. Seems to be what people want to see. Contributors: Offered to present: Dean Pemberton Wanted to see present but have not offered yet: Anyone doing v6 in NZ. Anyone with real world experience in migration issues. ############################################ - Multicast (MSDP, DNS as the roll of RP) Contributors: Offered to present: Mike Sutton Dean Pemberton Wanted to see present but have not offered yet: Citylink if they have any plans to Multicast content over the wgth fiber. Other people with multicast plans/experience. ############################################ - Local loop unbundling -- technical feasibility study Contributors: Offered: Citylink (Richard Naylor) ############################################ - Fibre MAN's, both Ethernet and DWDM Contributors: Would like to see: Citylink Telstra Clear Cisco ############################################ - QoS *Interest shown* Contributors: Offered: Dean Pemberton Would like to see: Anyone doing QoS in thier network ############################################ -Network Analysis/Network Monitoring Contributors Offered: Waikato Uni - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 2

NZNOG Conference Organisation [was RE:NZNOG Conference 2002: Feedback So Far]
by Donald Neal 18 Jan '02

18 Jan '02

>>> "Andy Linton" <asjl(a)lionra.net.nz> 01/14/02 01:44 >>> [...] >> So far, what feedback to the list there has been on format suggests >> that we're looking for a two-day residential event. If that is some sort >> of consensus, then I agree that it's time to think about content, but >> I'd like a more general organising group rather than merely a program >> committee, since decisions do need to be made about things like the >> venue and the price. Right now, I'd like more feedback to allow us to >> judge whether that is indeed a consensus view. >Well if that's the consensus view that what we want is a two-day >residential event and given Roger de Salis's insights into organising >something of this scale for Uniforum then we'll be lucky to get it running >until the end of the year. >If that's the case why don't we all agree to go to the Uniforum conference >in July - they've already done the work setting all that up. If enough of >us agree to go, we can arrange with them to provide a separate room to run >a Network stream in and piggy back on everything they've already >organised. That way we get to focus on content. Fair enough. I think we have from here four options. 1/ Organise something small. I'm not hearing any clear enthusiasm for that. 2/ Seek to have a stand-alone event organised by somebody else. The University of Waikato have made a credible offer to do this. They have experience of event organisation and have a venue which is likely to be suitable. We could accept that offer, or 3/ it may be possible to persuade one of the companies which have offered to assist with organisation to take on a primary role in that work. My impression is that NANOG rotate organisational work among a variety of corporate "hosts" as their gatherings move to different North American centres. 4/ Run an event within a larger event. In practice for this year this would mean the UniForum NZ conference. This is scheduled (with a final choice of hotel pending) to take place in Auckland in early to mid July. (The school holidays run 29 June - 14 July.) The convenor has suggested that NZNOG run a stream over a Thursday and Friday, with format and room requirements negotiable. The main conference seems likely to run Thursday - Sunday. There would be an option for people to register only for the Thursday and Friday. In any case, we would be aiming to keep under the sort of cost figure Roger De Salis has mentioned. I believe we could now proceed by accepting one of options 1, 2 or 4 and at the same time appoint a group of people to liaise with others involved and to coordinate a programme. Or we could appoint a group and leave the choice among options 2, 3 and 4 to them. Thoughts? Volunteers? - Donald Neal This is not a private communication. -- Donald Neal Special Operations Network Delivery Telecom New Zealand Ltd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you." ============================================================================== - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 2

Configuring Ethernet Sub-Interface on a Cisco 2503?
by Sahil Gupta - NET4U 17 Jan '02

17 Jan '02

Hello there, We currently peer to 2 providers. We have several SubNets of I.P's from them. Currently the Ethernet0 Interface of our Cisco Router handles all the I.P. Addresses. I was wondering if somebody here could advise me on how to create separate Sub-Interfaces for theses like we have with the Serial Interfaces. Our Ethernet Interface looks slightly like this at the moment: interface Ethernet0 description CISCO ROUTER ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x secondary ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x secondary no ip directed-broadcast I wish to split these up into 3 Sub-Interfaces. That way, it'll make it far easier to Graph Bandwith etc. Regards, Sahil Gupta NET4U Limited ------------------------------------ NET4U -- www.net4u.co.nz Home of the new - $24.95 128k ADSL Nationwide Internet Service Provider ------------------------------------ - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 2

RE: NZNOG Conference Organisation [was RE:NZNOG Conference2002: F eedback So Far]
by Allister Clarke 17 Jan '02

17 Jan '02

Did not check my spelling/grammar ... Long days at the moment :-) I am supporting a NZAEE conference! Allister. -----Original Message----- From: Allister Clarke Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 4:07 p.m. To: 'David Robb'; Dean Pemberton Cc: NZNOG List Subject: RE: NZNOG Conference Organisation [was RE:NZNOG Conference2002: F eedback So Far] I am keen for those topics. I am ask again ... Who here has CCNA or CCDA? Lindsay has lots of CC**. Another person said they have CCNA. Allister BSc - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

RE: NZNOG Conference Organisation [was RE:NZNOG Conference2002: F eedback So Far]
by Allister Clarke 17 Jan '02

17 Jan '02

I am keen for those topics. I am ask again ... Who here has CCNA or CCDA? Lindsay has lots of CC**. Another person said they have CCNA. Allister BSc -----Original Message----- From: David Robb [mailto:ender(a)paradise.gen.nz] Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2002 7:29 p.m. To: Dean Pemberton Cc: NZNOG List Subject: Re: NZNOG Conference Organisation [was RE:NZNOG Conference2002: Feedback So Far] On 16 Jan 2002, Dean Pemberton wrote: > We have thusfar had a few people interested in Wireless, A few in > DDos, and a few in Multicast. All in all about 10 people. This does > not a conference make. Well so as to add my vote, I'd be interested in Wireless, Neighbourhood networking, IPv6, and Multicasting (having been involved in all of the above to various extents). Hmm. IPv6 multicast over a wireless neighbourhood network anyone? :) --David Robb - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Re: Julian Angelo
by Donald Neal 17 Jan '02

17 Jan '02

>>> "Matthew Poole" <matthew.poole(a)attica.co.nz> 01/18/02 08:52 >>> >Just curious if anything more has been heard about Mr Angelo's supposed >approach to the Privacy Comission regarding the archives of this list >concerning him? >Donald? The meddling Dr Joe? Anybody? I have said that I will inform the list if I hear from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner. That assurance stands. - Donald Neal -- Donald Neal Special Operations Network Delivery Telecom New Zealand Ltd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you." ============================================================================== - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Julian Angelo
by Matthew Poole 17 Jan '02

17 Jan '02

Just curious if anything more has been heard about Mr Angelo's supposed approach to the Privacy Comission regarding the archives of this list concerning him? Donald? The meddling Dr Joe? Anybody? -- Matthew Poole "Ever wondered why cemetaries raise the cost of burials then blame it on the cost of living?" - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

4 3