- NZNOG - lists.nznog.org

Re: (Cheap) Wireless bridging options ?
by Simon Byrnand 20 Jan '02

20 Jan '02

[snip] >So I seem to have a few options: [snip] >4) Something else ? One other possibility is some kind of tunnel to send the "bridged" traffic over a routed connection, but I'm not sure what software (in Linux) I'd need to do that....(if it exists) Regards, Simon - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

RE: NZNOG Conference Organisation [was RE:NZNOG Conference 2002: Feedback So Far]
by Kefyn Judson (ENZ) 20 Jan '02

20 Jan '02

I will volenteer to help. Call me conservative, but I would like to see a very successful small gathering that leaves us all wanting more (option1) rather than a large event that burns out the organisers, pauper the participants and satisfies no-one. I guess I am of the walk before you run camp. KJ -----Original Message----- From: Donald Neal [mailto:Donald.Neal(a)telecom.co.nz] Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2002 3:06 p.m. To: asjl(a)lionra.net.nz Cc: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: NZNOG Conference Organisation [was RE:NZNOG Conference 2002: Feedback So Far] >>> "Andy Linton" <asjl(a)lionra.net.nz> 01/14/02 01:44 >>> [...] >> So far, what feedback to the list there has been on format suggests >> that we're looking for a two-day residential event. If that is some sort >> of consensus, then I agree that it's time to think about content, but >> I'd like a more general organising group rather than merely a program >> committee, since decisions do need to be made about things like the >> venue and the price. Right now, I'd like more feedback to allow us to >> judge whether that is indeed a consensus view. >Well if that's the consensus view that what we want is a two-day >residential event and given Roger de Salis's insights into organising >something of this scale for Uniforum then we'll be lucky to get it running >until the end of the year. >If that's the case why don't we all agree to go to the Uniforum conference >in July - they've already done the work setting all that up. If enough of >us agree to go, we can arrange with them to provide a separate room to run >a Network stream in and piggy back on everything they've already >organised. That way we get to focus on content. Fair enough. I think we have from here four options. 1/ Organise something small. I'm not hearing any clear enthusiasm for that. 2/ Seek to have a stand-alone event organised by somebody else. The University of Waikato have made a credible offer to do this. They have experience of event organisation and have a venue which is likely to be suitable. We could accept that offer, or 3/ it may be possible to persuade one of the companies which have offered to assist with organisation to take on a primary role in that work. My impression is that NANOG rotate organisational work among a variety of corporate "hosts" as their gatherings move to different North American centres. 4/ Run an event within a larger event. In practice for this year this would mean the UniForum NZ conference. This is scheduled (with a final choice of hotel pending) to take place in Auckland in early to mid July. (The school holidays run 29 June - 14 July.) The convenor has suggested that NZNOG run a stream over a Thursday and Friday, with format and room requirements negotiable. The main conference seems likely to run Thursday - Sunday. There would be an option for people to register only for the Thursday and Friday. In any case, we would be aiming to keep under the sort of cost figure Roger De Salis has mentioned. I believe we could now proceed by accepting one of options 1, 2 or 4 and at the same time appoint a group of people to liaise with others involved and to coordinate a programme. Or we could appoint a group and leave the choice among options 2, 3 and 4 to them. Thoughts? Volunteers? - Donald Neal This is not a private communication. -- Donald Neal Special Operations Network Delivery Telecom New Zealand Ltd ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you." ============================================================================ == - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

test
by Mark Foster 20 Jan '02

20 Jan '02

Just testing to see if this is going to go through, since it seems theres some mail delivery lag going on.. - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

(Cheap) Wireless bridging options ?
by Simon Byrnand 20 Jan '02

20 Jan '02

Hi Wireless guru's (he says hopefully :) In the next month or so I'm in need of a simple Wireless Bridge setup to temporarily Bridge the Ethernet's of two buildings for about 2 days. The distance is under 500 metres, and it must be bridged, not routed. I already have on hand a variety of old and new 802.11b wireless gear (Lucent/Orinoco) so I'd like to use what I have if possible. In particular I've got a couple of Lucent Wavepoint-II access points sitting around spare. The catch is that the normal access point firmware will not bridge between two access points, it will only connect to client stations. The client cards I have are also Lucent (Silver) cards, and those cannot do bridging as a client, as either the driver or firmware (probably the firmware) on the card doesn't allow it. (Believe me, I've tried, unless I've missed some trick :-) So I seem to have a few options: 1) Get the "Remote Outdoor Router" firmware and enabling keys for both access points - this would allow them to bridge two networks, but the cost is high - a bit of searching on the net and the lowest price I could find was around $800 NZ *each*. ~ $1600 for something that is only going to be needed for a couple of days is out of the question. 2) Some trick to be able to bridge with a Silver card being used in a "client" role. (No luck finding anything yet) 3) Abandon the Lucent cards and find some other card whose drivers allow bridging, and set up a linux machine (or linux boot disk) that will bridge between that card and the ethernet. Assuming the brand of card will connect to the Lucent Access point, the access point can do the bridging at the other end. If that wouldn't work, I'd need two of that kind of card and two PC's...(the PC's and the Linux boot disk aren't a problem, I'm pretty fluent in Linux) 4) Something else ? Any suggestions from those a bit more versed in Wireless techniques gratefully received.. Regards, Simon - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Wanted!
by Michael Hallager 19 Jan '02

19 Jan '02

Hi all, I would like to purchase a link (256k?) with IP addresses from an ISP with an ATM located in the Auckland area. Virtual ISP's and those reselling other's services (IOW: Do not own their own infastructure) need not apply. Also, this is not to be confused with a post that I made, of a similar nature, but for a different requirement, about 3 months ago. I can be contacted in confidence via E-Mail. Please include your contact details. Best regards, Michael Hallager Managing Director Comsolve Networks (NZ) Limited E-Mail: michael(a)comsolve.net.nz Website: http://www.comsolve.net.nz Proudly providing hosting exclusively to 100% family-safe content sites. - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 2

NASA Television Streaming - Multicast or Unicast
by WALLY 19 Jan '02

19 Jan '02

Hello All, I've been trying to stream NASA Television into our television repeater CH 39 UHF here in Auckland for some time now. This will reduce the potential risk of radio hams losing CH 39 UHF. Raido Hams have recently lost 440 MHz to 449.750 MHz our previous TV reapeater input frequency. I know that the CH 39 UHF power levels are low with new linking equiptment being constructed and purchased.A power up grade is on the cards also. We have a high power broadcast tv transmitter but nowhere to install it without complaints (resource consents, power and site costs etc).We are unable to run this high power transmitter at our current site as there is no room for it. The club arrangement is a non profit order.This is a problem also. I hope this year will be an expansion year for CH 39 UHF. Currently we are under pressure such as the MED,RSM UHF TV call to for expressions of interest for community tv licences (CH 35 to 42).The other option is to apply for an ad-hoc licence after the first round of community licences have been let.If there are any left.Yes,ad-hoc as the MED,RSM call it. Link to MED. http://www.med.govt.nz/rsm/licensing/uhftveoi.html NASATV cannot be pulled off direct satellite here in New. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Multicasting I've not had the support from large ISPs to accomodate this. The CH 39 UHF Television Radio Ham exercise runs at low cost. Were trying to promote NASATV and encourage the public of all ages to get educated and have fun on the internet and internet ham radio. NASATV has many web sites constantly informing the world wide public to gain access and learn something in their lives.These web sites are often transmitted via CH 39 UHF and hopefully promote and encourage people to become aware of the need to have internet comunications.Get connected and live again. I see this as a win,win for all. 7kbps to 13kbps is not what broadband is about.The buffering is on and off constantly. My Jetstart service has some what been reduced ( some services disabled,Load Balancing ,IP assend IP desend,Multicasting disabled etc ). I have two Jetstart accounts with Telecom Xtra. All I really need is a quality multicast connection at no less than 64kbps.I can't de-compress 28kbps well enough to an acceptable level,tv-out full screen etc.100Kbps is even better but too costly at present.300kbps flys and de-compresses well.Its very expensive and still stops and starts with no connection or 7kbps to 16kbps with no picture and audio breaking up. Whats missing in customer contracts is the information disclosing what features (hardware or filters and services) are disabled or dis-allowed.A customer believes that they are purchasing full access to where they intend to connect. Thanks all, Wally Muzyka, Radio Ham ZL1VWM, NASATV Supporter. Email: zl1vwm(a)xtra.co.nz PS: The Auckland VHF Group club rooms can be made available for a group of say up to fifty people if you get stuck sorting out a place for your first NZNOG Conference.It's in Hazel Ave,Mt Roskill.The building is of school class room size sited on the Council Reserve.I know of another radio ham Simon from Cisco who may wish to rally up support for NZNOG.There are other radio hams that work in the IP industry also.Would you like to invite them to NZNOG Conference also or have a closed meeting instead.

4 3

mailing list request
by zl1vwm＠xtra.co.nz 18 Jan '02

18 Jan '02

subscribe Wally Muzyka - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Fwd: Re: Updated topic list.
by Mark Foster 18 Jan '02

18 Jan '02

Oops, forgot reply-all... >Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 13:58:38 +1300 >To: Lin Nah <lin(a)darkmere.gen.nz> >From: Mark Foster <blakjak(a)blakjak.net> >Subject: Re: Updated topic list. > >Seconded. Any objections? ;) > > > >At 13:07 19/01/2002 +1300, you wrote: > >>On 16 Jan 2002, Dean Pemberton wrote: >> >> > Ok - I'm using the list that Andreas sent out as a basis for this. >> > I'm unsure if the Contributors lines were people who had expressed an >> > interest to present - or who people WANTED to present. So I'm going to >> > split them up, into offered/wanted. >> >>Nominate Dean for NZNOG Conference Content coordinator? >> >>Lin >> >>- >>To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz >>where the body of your message reads: >>unsubscribe nznog - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

Updated topic list.
by Dean Pemberton 18 Jan '02

18 Jan '02

Ok - I'm using the list that Andreas sent out as a basis for this. I'm unsure if the Contributors lines were people who had expressed an interest to present - or who people WANTED to present. So I'm going to split them up, into offered/wanted. ############################################ - Wireless beyond 2.4 GHz - Wireless Network Security Issues - Network Sniffing demo. - Free Community Wireless *Interest in this has been expressed* Contributors: Offered to present: Dean Pemberton Wanted to see present: Anyone who has built or wants to build a free community wireless network. People from WalkerWireless or Citylink about their plans to use wireless to take over the world. ############################################ - Voice over IP - end-user telephony and Toll-bypass *Much interest expressed* Contributors: Wanted to see present: Cisco Citylink Any of the telco's if they are thinking of offering VoiP gateways. ############################################ - Security and Abuse - SPAM - SOP6 and freedom on the net - DDoS attacks *Much interest in DDos - less in Spam and SOP6* Contributors: YOUR NAME HERE! Wanted to see present: Any company doing DDoS detection work ############################################ - MPLS (Intro/overview) - rfc2547bis MPLS VPN's *Didn't see much interest, flagged for deletion ############################################ - OSPF/ISIS/BGP (anything that people want to know) *Some interest but not a whole lot* In order for this to go ahead I need some more scope. What do people want to know? Contributors: Offered: Dean Pemberton ############################################ - IPv6. Migration strategies *Hot topic. Seems to be what people want to see. Contributors: Offered to present: Dean Pemberton Wanted to see present but have not offered yet: Anyone doing v6 in NZ. Anyone with real world experience in migration issues. ############################################ - Multicast (MSDP, DNS as the roll of RP) Contributors: Offered to present: Mike Sutton Dean Pemberton Wanted to see present but have not offered yet: Citylink if they have any plans to Multicast content over the wgth fiber. Other people with multicast plans/experience. ############################################ - Local loop unbundling -- technical feasibility study Contributors: Offered: Citylink (Richard Naylor) ############################################ - Fibre MAN's, both Ethernet and DWDM Contributors: Would like to see: Citylink Telstra Clear Cisco ############################################ - QoS *Interest shown* Contributors: Offered: Dean Pemberton Would like to see: Anyone doing QoS in thier network ############################################ -Network Analysis/Network Monitoring Contributors Offered: Waikato Uni - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 2

NZNOG Conference Organisation [was RE:NZNOG Conference 2002: Feedback So Far]
by Donald Neal 18 Jan '02

18 Jan '02

>>> "Andy Linton" <asjl(a)lionra.net.nz> 01/14/02 01:44 >>> [...] >> So far, what feedback to the list there has been on format suggests >> that we're looking for a two-day residential event. If that is some sort >> of consensus, then I agree that it's time to think about content, but >> I'd like a more general organising group rather than merely a program >> committee, since decisions do need to be made about things like the >> venue and the price. Right now, I'd like more feedback to allow us to >> judge whether that is indeed a consensus view. >Well if that's the consensus view that what we want is a two-day >residential event and given Roger de Salis's insights into organising >something of this scale for Uniforum then we'll be lucky to get it running >until the end of the year. >If that's the case why don't we all agree to go to the Uniforum conference >in July - they've already done the work setting all that up. If enough of >us agree to go, we can arrange with them to provide a separate room to run >a Network stream in and piggy back on everything they've already >organised. That way we get to focus on content. Fair enough. I think we have from here four options. 1/ Organise something small. I'm not hearing any clear enthusiasm for that. 2/ Seek to have a stand-alone event organised by somebody else. The University of Waikato have made a credible offer to do this. They have experience of event organisation and have a venue which is likely to be suitable. We could accept that offer, or 3/ it may be possible to persuade one of the companies which have offered to assist with organisation to take on a primary role in that work. My impression is that NANOG rotate organisational work among a variety of corporate "hosts" as their gatherings move to different North American centres. 4/ Run an event within a larger event. In practice for this year this would mean the UniForum NZ conference. This is scheduled (with a final choice of hotel pending) to take place in Auckland in early to mid July. (The school holidays run 29 June - 14 July.) The convenor has suggested that NZNOG run a stream over a Thursday and Friday, with format and room requirements negotiable. The main conference seems likely to run Thursday - Sunday. There would be an option for people to register only for the Thursday and Friday. In any case, we would be aiming to keep under the sort of cost figure Roger De Salis has mentioned. I believe we could now proceed by accepting one of options 1, 2 or 4 and at the same time appoint a group of people to liaise with others involved and to coordinate a programme. Or we could appoint a group and leave the choice among options 2, 3 and 4 to them. Thoughts? Volunteers? - Donald Neal This is not a private communication. -- Donald Neal Special Operations Network Delivery Telecom New Zealand Ltd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you." ============================================================================== - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 2