- NZNOG - lists.nznog.org

Re: Asia Online and Spammers
by Mark Foster 26 Oct '01

26 Oct '01

Thank you Juha, got it in one. :) At 10:26 27/10/2001 +1300, Juha Saarinen wrote: >On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Joe Abley wrote: > > > What is "one of our group"? > >The nasty buncha spammers that hang out in NZNOG, of course. > >-- > > > > >Regards, > > >Juha > >--------- >To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz >where the body of your message reads: >unsubscribe nznog --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Shouldn't ICONZ/Asia Online put something on its Web site...?
by Juha Saarinen 26 Oct '01

26 Oct '01

I'm sure customers would appreciate that. -- Juha Saarinen --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Whats Happened to Asiaonline (Ref: from Aardvark)
by Craig Whitmore 26 Oct '01

26 Oct '01

Hi.. I just saw something on Aardvark (http://www.aardvark.co.nz) about AsiaOnline. Is this true, or just a unfounded rumour? Thanks Craig Whitmore --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

9 15

Asia On-Line Spamming
by Roger De Salis 26 Oct '01

26 Oct '01

I've seen the list, and response from Steve Phillips asking for time. I've received a copy of the SPAM in question. There is an accusation made that Domainz data was used to generate the SPAM. Freely available zone-xfers were turned off several months ago, so it is possible that an out of date zone-xfer could have been used. I have no idea beyond this what/how/why. There is no policy on this, other than the generic - "thou shalt not SPAM". It might be useful therefore that the industry generates it's own policy on this. What is a suitable penalty? An example of what could be easily implemented would be a modest delay to registration change overs. ================================================================== Recent SPAMMING of the entire .NZ by the Melbourne Company ING with the suggestion that failure to act would not permit pre-registration of .info and .biz resulted in the suspension of ability to do DNS changes. That company remains suspended until a meaningful "I'm Sorry" is forthcoming, at their expense. ================================================================= Two points. An "I'm Sorry" wouldn't go amiss. You know who you are. A thoughtful discouse would be useful about how transgressors may have their rights limited for a period of time, so as to encourage the correct behaviour would be something we would be happy to help create. Rgds Roger -- \_ Roger De Salis rdesalis(a)cisco.com </' Cisco Systems NZ Ltd +64 25 481 452 /) L8, ASB Tower, 2 Hunter St +64 4 496 9003 (/ Wellington, New Zealand roger(a)desalis.gen.nz ` In October 2001, the 5th most important product line by value for Cisco is - the telephone. Cisco 79x0 IP telephones. --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

prefix list change
by Richard Haakma 24 Oct '01

24 Oct '01

Hi. Would those who peer with KCCS note that there is a change to KCCS' networks. Network 202.37.78.0/24 is not advertised by KCCS any more. An amended prefix list is below. Regards, RH. ip prefix-list KCCS-nets description KC Computer Services noc(a)kc.net.nz ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 5 permit 202.14.82.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 10 permit 202.14.102.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 15 permit 202.20.65.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 20 permit 202.20.92.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 25 permit 202.21.157.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 30 permit 202.27.83.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 35 permit 202.27.192.0/21 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 40 permit 202.27.200.0/22 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 45 permit 202.27.209.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 50 permit 202.27.210.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 55 permit 202.27.211.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 60 permit 202.27.212.0/22 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 70 permit 202.27.216.0/22 le 24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 75 permit 202.27.222.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 80 permit 202.27.236.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 85 permit 202.27.247.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 90 permit 202.27.251.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 95 permit 202.36.43.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 100 permit 202.36.75.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 105 permit 202.36.154.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 110 permit 202.37.70.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 115 permit 202.37.71.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 120 permit 202.37.75.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 125 permit 202.37.117.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 130 permit 202.37.118.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 135 permit 202.37.168.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 140 permit 202.49.141.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 145 permit 202.49.183.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 150 permit 202.49.189.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 155 permit 202.49.233.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 160 permit 202.50.95.0/24 ip prefix-list KCCS-nets seq 165 permit 202.50.164.0/24 --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

DS3 problem
by PER-LIM-Cabanillas, Jose 23 Oct '01

23 Oct '01

Hi, I'am writing from Perú, here we have a Nortel Passport 7400 with a 3 ports DS3 card. we are recently connected to other Passport in USA through Global Crossing (GC) SDH network. between the GC ADM and our Passport (ATM Switch) we have 50 meters of coaxial cable with BNC connectors. We checked the cable, its OK. the problem is that in the DS3 statistics, we have PathCodeViolations. we have this config used from USA to others places so we don´t know what is the problems (maybe the SDH network?). If the problem is in the SDH how can I detect it ?. I can find information about DS3 and PathCodeViolations. I'll be appreciate any information or relative link Thanks --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

Re:
by Adrian Smith 22 Oct '01

22 Oct '01

Thanks for all your replies. It is now working ok, with and without the dot at the end, thanks. Looks like the problem has cleared now. The reason I asked the original question is that the icq client failed instantly to connect. Usually it sits there for a while and then times out if the icq network is temporarily unreachable. Adrian >>> "Phil Groom" <pgroom(a)tasmail.com> 10/23/01 11:06 >>> G'day Adrian, nslookup will append the "default" domain name to the given host if the given host does not contain a trailing "." Perhaps that is what you are seeing when you set debug. I assume that you do not see strangness when debug is off (I don't). Phill. -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Smith [SMTP:Adrian.Smith(a)natlib.govt.nz] Sent: Tuesday, 23 October 2001 8:50 am To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: strange results from nslookup of icq.mirabilis.com Can anyone tell me why nslookup is adding my domain name on to an nslookup of icq.mirabilis.com ... and then trying to do a lookup on that ? -- www.tasmail.com --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

strange results from nslookup of icq.mirabilis.com
by Adrian Smith 22 Oct '01

22 Oct '01

Can anyone tell me why nslookup is adding my domain name on to an nslookup of icq.mirabilis.com ... and then trying to do a lookup on that ? Is it because mirabilis.com are not returning any nameserver records in the authority records ? planet:~$ nslookup Default Server: planet.natlib.govt.nz Address: 192.122.171.130 > set debug > icq.mirabilis.com Server: planet.natlib.govt.nz Address: 192.122.171.130 ;; res_nmkquery(QUERY, icq.mirabilis.com, IN, A) ------------ Got answer: HEADER: opcode = QUERY, id = 63705, rcode = NXDOMAIN header flags: response, auth. answer, want recursion, recursion avail. questions = 1, answers = 1, authority records = 1, additional = 0 QUESTIONS: icq.mirabilis.com, type = A, class = IN ANSWERS: -> icq.mirabilis.com canonical name = icq.fes.mirabilis.com ttl = 600 (10M) AUTHORITY RECORDS: -> mirabilis.com ttl = 600 (10M) origin = dns-01.icq.net mail addr = hostmaster.icq.net serial = 2001101601 refresh = 600 (10M) retry = 300 (5M) expire = 604800 (1W) minimum ttl = 600 (10M) ------------ ;; res_nmkquery(QUERY, icq.mirabilis.com.natlib.govt.nz, IN, A) ------------ Got answer: HEADER: opcode = QUERY, id = 63706, rcode = NXDOMAIN header flags: response, auth. answer, want recursion, recursion avail. questions = 1, answers = 0, authority records = 1, additional = 0 QUESTIONS: icq.mirabilis.com.natlib.govt.nz, type = A, class = IN AUTHORITY RECORDS: -> natlib.govt.nz ttl = 86400 (1D) origin = dns1.natlib.govt.nz mail addr = networks.natlib.govt.nz serial = 2001102309 refresh = 3600 (1H) retry = 1200 (20M) expire = 1728000 (1728000) minimum ttl = 86400 (1D) ------------ *** planet.natlib.govt.nz can't find icq.mirabilis.com: Non-existent host/domain > At first I thought it was a problem with our dns, but I have repeated the same query from other NZ sites nameservers and seem to be getting similar results. Are any other NZ ISP's or nznog people seeing a similar problem? Thanks Adrian Smith --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 2

(no subject)
by Phil Groom 22 Oct '01

22 Oct '01

G'day Adrian, nslookup will append the "default" domain name to the given host if the given host does not contain a trailing "." Perhaps that is what you are seeing when you set debug. I assume that you do not see strangness when debug is off (I don't). Phill. -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Smith [SMTP:Adrian.Smith(a)natlib.govt.nz] Sent: Tuesday, 23 October 2001 8:50 am To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: strange results from nslookup of icq.mirabilis.com Can anyone tell me why nslookup is adding my domain name on to an nslookup of icq.mirabilis.com ... and then trying to do a lookup on that ? -- www.tasmail.com --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

The weakest link
by Michael Newbery 17 Oct '01

17 Oct '01

I'm trying to identify throughput speeds of typical low (and not so low) end network devices. With carrier networks that outperform many people's infrastructure, I'd like to have some sort of a list that says Cisco 1605R <p Mbps Cisco 2600 <q Mbps Win95/98 <y Mbps TCP WinME/2K <z Mbps TCP Any pointers to where such info might be found? Real-world is what I'd prefer. We hit this even with the cable modems where 2Mbps was faster than many PCs could make use of (three years ago). It's got worse. We can put Smartbits testers on links during commissioning, but that's not really helpful to the customers, who want at least some reasonable pointer as to why going from 64kbps to 1Gbps isn't giving them the throughput they expected. I thought I'd start with Scott Bradner's old Harvard tests, but I can't find them anymore. -- Michael Newbery Technical Specialist TelstraSaturn Limited Tel: +64-4-939 5102 Mobile: +64-29-939 5102 Fax: +64-4-922 8401 --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1