>Would this list have the same sort of policy for membership as nsp-sec?
>i.e. an invite only list for people who actually have to do the work
>with a policy of kicking out people who don't meet the membership
>criteria on an ongoing basis.
>
>If that's the case then I can see value in such a list but if it's
>going to be similar to NZNOG with an "anybody can join" policy then I'm
>less interested.
>
>andy
I agree with Andy here. The only list I would be interested in is one
which subscribes to the nsp-sec policy.
No lurking.
You have to be the person who is able to make the changes.
Change jobs and you unsub.
And some others.
It's the only way. An "anyone can join" list will degrade into.... well
my opinions here should remain to myself =)
I would suggest that people look at joining nsp-sec rather than
re-inventing the wheel. Or at the very least getting Rob to host an
nsp-sec-nz list with the same policy around it. If you are a large
provider, then there is probably already content on nsp-sec that you
should know about.
Dean.
